Skeptic Project

The usual suspects: Voice of Reason and Ed V.

http://muertos.blog.com/2010/05/06/the-zeitgeist-movement-take-2-conspiracies-are-us/#comment-290<br /> https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5204383083266475690&postID=802784479114642065

Latest complaints against me: they figured out I used to be a lawyer, so now everything I do is a "lawyer-like" twist of words, evasion of points, etc.

Nothing new here, but thought I'd mention it just for the lulz.

Everyone knows lawyers are keeping the public in the dark about sovereign citizen laws.

http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/7038/vor.png" />

No, that is his head.

What I want to know is this:

If the movies aren't the movement, as VTV claims, then how does one address people who come to the movement as a result of believing in the conspiracy theories espoused in the films? Certainly, the first film paints a picture that the unwitting viewer would come to fear if he or she did not do any significant research regarding the claims. This fear of the conspiratorial world view, which has repeatedly questioned and laid bare, then drives the viewer to go to the Zeitgeist movement because it could help stop the powers they have come to fear (regardless of how fictitious these powers of).So, if there is no outright denunciation of the conspiracy claims, doesn't these mean the movement is populated by those whos motives are to stop the conspiracy at play? This then leaves some pretty harsh possibilities: TZM is using fear to garner support for their cause or TZM is a conspiracy movement and just don't want the stigma that comes with believing in baseless conspiracies.

Logic is an inside job to trick us.