Skeptic Project

I found out VTV has a forum up for V-radio so I'm going to hop on and say hi Hopefully he holds up to what his site disclaimer says and I'm not banned on the spot. I decided to join the forum because I've never really talked directly to VTV besides maybe 1 time or so and most of the other times we have communicated indirectly. I'm a bit confused that the guy never tried to contact me directly if he had a problem with me tbh. I'm actually a reasonable person, therefore I'll use this as a chance to see what VTV's all about.

"Forum rules
The only thing that can get you banned from this forum is engaging in personal attack or ad hominem fallacies."

http://forum.v-radio.org

Just a FYI for people expecting me to call VTV fat and poor such as what I've done here I will not be doing so on the newly discovered webforum. Reason being out of respect for VTV's site and following the rules I will not be doing so as CS has it's own set of rules that I abide by so will VTV's site. Also in general when talking directly to another individual I do not call them such things. The CS site to me is a place to blow off some steam when talking to CTer's.

@NWO Florist I've never talk to the guy before and if he does ban me this thread in itself is about transparency I'll report that and move on.

in this thread =P

So, Bill, basically, this is another experiment in how TZM acts to people that criticize it. Am I getting that right?

But I agree with NWO Florist, I bet you'll be banned pretty quick. But in a way, I hope we're also proven wrong.

Internet shit isn't really direct conversation.

You could call into his dumb Internet audio show.

I refuse to call that a "radio" show. Because it isn't. Anyone with a microphone and a computer can do that shit.

When you change the definition of what ad hominem means you can apply it to anything you want.

I just don't see the point. All you'll do is feed into his sense of self importance and persecution. His forum is a joke and a barren wasteland. Its not like he's going to be any more intellectually honest on his own forum than any other one. He's simply not capable of it.

What exactly do you hope to accomplish with this "direct communication"?

"When you change the definition of what ad hominem means you can apply it to anything you want."

I imagine he put that rule in place so people won't comment on his poverty or hilariously pathetic lifestyle.