Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Help Me Debunk Flight 253 Underwear Bomber Conspiracy

Tags: to do, Flight 253, underwear bomber [ Add Tags ]

[ Return to Alex Jones and Friends | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 10:35
(0)
 

Level: 0

Kurt Haskell is a survivor of the underwear bomber plot. He's claiming someone let the guy on the plane on purpose.

Here he is on a local station. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoDqUyqsxgg

His Blog
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/</p>

We could possibly add this as a section to this website.

But before I "contribute" it I have to make sure it's well researched.

Here are the questions that need to be answered to make this stuff go away
http://usaintelreport.blogspot.com/2011/02/underwear-bomber-conspiracy-or-intel.html

REMEMBER
No conspiracy sites!!!

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 10:43
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original
#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 10:51
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Some of the passengers on the plane had said they saw him accompanied at the gate in Amsterdam by an older, well-dressed Indian or Pakistani man. But the review of more than 200 hours of video showed no one with him, the officials said."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/05/us-security-airline-idUSTRE6043YO20100105</p>

Video doesn't lie, but eye witnesses are notoriously wrong.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 10:52
(0)
 

Level: 0

Alight that's one question answered

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 10:56
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

What other questions are there? Haskell's entire conspiracy theory relies on another man. There was no other man.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:02
(0)
 

Level: 0

Who was the man videotaping the attack?

Apparently according to witnesses a man videotaped the entire event. "He sat up and videotaped the entire thing, very calmly," said Keepman. "We do know that the FBI is looking for him intensely. Since then, we've heard nothing about it." At this point it is not known.
http://www.620wtmj.com/news/local/80201152.html</p>

http://i.current.com/images/asset/903/155/42/2QdkaD.jpg<br /> In Keepman's CNN interview she mentioned the guy with the camera when the CNN anchor pointed out the still image superimposed on the screen of the bomber getting apprehended. http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2009/12/29/ac.terror.flight.cnn?iref=videosearch

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:04
(0)
 

Level: 0
#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:05
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

The same witnesses who saw an accomplice that doesn't exist?

I would say that you'd need to prove that said videotaping man existed before anyone needs to prove he did not.

Kurt Haskell is a 911 Truther. The man is bonkers. Why does it matter what he says when no one and nothing corroborates it?

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:09
(0)
 

Level: 0

That's a different witness seeing a different person.
I'm trying to get them around every corner.
That's the way to disprove something.
Read my last comment

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:12
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I was referering to Haskell wanting to see the video.

Also, I said witnesses not witness. I see no reason to even consider eyewitnesses when security video showed nothing other than Abdullajoobawababawhatever.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:21
(0)
 

Level: 0

I guess your right.
It's kind of like wanting to see the footage of the pentagon hit by the plane or Obama releasing his long form birth certificate. That's the only thing that will convince them.

But i guess it's legit to release the footage of the bomber like they did with the 911 hijackers. They probably will at the trial. Kurt will be there to see it.

#11 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:44
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

No, it wouldn't convince them. They would simply say the footage has been tampered with.

#12 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
shamsham1090Posted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:49
(0)
 

Level: 0

Yeah
Have you heard about the conspiracy that the JFK footage is a fake? How do those people live with themselves
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Am4qdl9PTA

#13 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 22, 2011 - 11:50
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

They're cranks.

Its no deeper than that.

#14 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]