Skeptic Project

I have screen grabs of all the evidence too:

here is the text version taken from my blog with all links as evidence:

http://anticultist.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/who-is-peter-joseph/#comment-1151</p>

#

There’s also a youtube video of Peter Joseph when he didn’t correct someone who called him “Doctor”… now I don’t know about you,
but in my book that’s straight-up antichrist dildo worhsip woman hitler stuff right there.

I know his type, he’s this navel-gazing hipster, and zeitgeist was just a hobby of his – if I was younger, I’d call up my buddies and we’d beat him up with a bat, make him our bitch and then dump his raped wop ass in little italy.

If there’s anything I hate, that’s immigrants and people being uppity about capitalism. If you work and wait for your turn, you’ll be rich… there’s nothing wrong with the system, the wrong one is you mister Pee-Jay Merola.

BabeRuth said this on June 25, 2010 at 4:35 am [11 or so hours ago]| Reply (edit)

My reply:

http://anticultist.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/who-is-peter-joseph/#comment-1152</p>

#

ok I agree with some of your sentiments but the raped ass, beaten body and stuff is a little too far for me:D

But yeah the guy is a prick and should be given no serious airtime at all because hes of no value to anyone.

anticultist said this on June 25, 2010 at 10:28 am [5 or so hours ago] | Reply (edit)

Leaving it open for them to come back and try some more attempts at covert violence

But then someone came over and pointed out I should remove it, but I had a plan.

BUT I have enough evidence to show what I was doing here:

http://anticultist.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/who-is-peter-joseph/#comment-1154</p>

*

I am smart and you know what I will do. I will leave it up here for people to see the lengths that zeitgeisters will go to, to infiltrate oppositional views and try to turn them into perceptably aggressive groups.

I replied to their post and stated that violence was not needed, they were the one who mentioned violence not I, since they are probably the guy ‘Super stylin’ who made the post in the Re:Peter Joseph thread about infiltrating oppositonal groups here:

http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=99999&func=view&catid=231&id=269881&limit=10&limitstart=10#270127

Super stylin said 11 Hours, 45 Minutes ago:
I’ve found on another site that some Anon guy uncoveder Peter Joseph’s full real name and other info, and it’s pretty convincing and all that,
but then the entire discussion devolves into bashing PJ, Jacques, Roxanne and all which Z stands for. It’s all pretty much disgusting ad hominem stuff,
but it’s written in a way that could be potentially damaging to the Zeitgeist movement.

In any case, I just wanted to say that IMO the best strategy against this sort of douchebaggery would be to one-up the haters.
When confronted with this type of fanatical viciousness against a good ideal, you just join them… it might sound dumb,
but if you join the bashing, and drive it to ridiculous levels, you completely strip them of any semblance of validity.

The elites have been doing this for ages. Whenever there’s a protest against, for example, Bilderberg,
they infiltrate the protesters with a few undercover agents who do their best to escalate the protest into a violent riot.

You see, if you’re clear on that the opposition’s stance is worthless, you infiltrate them with a few agents who
will play ultraviolent douchebags who will stink up their place, and nobody will want to listen to someone associated with
violent morons.

It is good to show others how fail they are, and what incredible lengths they go to defend their cult

And regarding this post in the same thread:

http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=99999&func=view&catid=231&id=269881&limit=10&limitstart=20#270168

hellgorama said:
@superstylin, I think you’ve come across anticultist’s blog. He’s just like that because he used to be a former member, but he trolled here and got banned. If he can’t move on with his life, then just goes to show what a sad person he is.

I was never banned and I never trolled their forum, this guy knows nothing about me or who I was on their forum.

anticultist said this on June 25, 2010 at 4:18 pm (edit)

Exactly Edward, but as you can see the evidence points to that member specifically targetting my blog and telling them what they should do, and then they do it.

They are fucking insane and using very dirty tactics.

I think I should leave it there as evidence Edward, it is not a serious threat it is clearly a zeitgeist member attempting to manipulate the blog.

read the links Nanos, catch up.

They made the post on the zeitgeist forum, then an hour or two later they made a violent post on my blog. Noone has ever made a violent post like that against the zeitgeist movement in all the time I have been running the blog.

It was a first poster and the IP tracks to here:

http://www.utrace.de/?query=213.198.197.119

Yes I totally agree with condemning violence too and I have on more than one occasion expressed this in my blog that I would never wish any harm to Peter and did so in those very blog posts.

So the person making the post on my blog [ a zeitgeister with a 2 post account on TZM forum] more than likely a sock puppet account of a current member, or a completely new member who is oblivious to how to behave, just made a complete arsehole of himself as well as his movement.

Actually hurting TZM members would likely give the group more attention and a sense of martyrdom (more so than many already have). Of course, this opens the door to black propaganda as anticultist has experienced, if that is a TZM member making the violent claims of course.