Skeptic Project

Just...grotesque. That's all it is. These people are not compassionate...they are narcissistic ideologues who really don't care about other people. They just want to be right. And even if their disgusting fantasies came true, they'd just prance around yelling 'I TOLD YOU SO LOL' instead of actually helping people.

As I was reading through the thread I came across this in one of the replies:
"Go watch the real news, not the corporate owned lame-stream media."
Now I know that they're always blasting mainstream media but it raised a question that I'd never really given much thought. What do they consider to be real news? Aside form Alex Jones and CT websites.

these films ignore a key economic concept: cost. It'd be nice to organize the world in a certain way and raise every human to have the healthiest possible value system, but it's also very costly. To do that, basic economics tells us we'd have to forego other valuable opportunities.

That's what I tried to tell them, too. So did hex on VTV's forum, but it's a waste of time. They're incapable of grasping the concept, although it's not even contradicting their RBE thingy, it's just another variable for the magic supercomputer to deal with.

^hmmm sounds suspiciously like barter. No thanks.

"Go watch the real news, not the corporate owned lame-stream media."

Zeitards using Palin-speak. Hilarious.

Oh yes they WANT "the world to burn" most definitely.

They think the only way to get a RBE in is for the world to "collapse" first, reminds me a lot of religious fundamentalists waiting for the second coming. They are always trying to look for signs that the collapse is imminent

Because they're True Believers. If they want an RBE, naturally everyone else must want it too.

According to the audiance stats, it's primarily searched for by young (typically teenage), males with no children or education.

I just notice how its traffic stats just keep going down, down, down...shouldn't a growing movement be going the other way?

In general, whoever wrote the excerpt in CJ's post is delusional.

Surbitonpete is definitely a True Believer.

You'll have a hard time finding a Zeitgeist member more paranoid, delusional and blindly loyal than him.

Dude you don't want to go around saying things like that :D CT's have a habit of always surprising me.

Isn't Surbitonpete some crazy British dude on welfare. I remember reading a post once about how he didn't work and was on the dole for disability. I wonder if its for mental illness, because that guy is really out there.

Also, Eissenberg says, it's not very clear what smokers are getting when they take a drag on an e-cigarette. In a study published in July, Eissenberg and colleagues had 32 smokers take puffs on two brands of e-cigarettes, the NPRO with 18 mg. of nicotine and a model from Crown7 with 16 mg. Each smoker took 20 normal puffs, with a short break after the first 10. The study found that electronic cigarettes did reduce the urge to smoke, but, importantly, neither brand delivered measurable amounts of nicotine to the users' bloodstreams. Eissenberg suspects that the devices are so similar to cigarettes that they can help fill the psychological urge to smoke even if they don't provide much nicotine.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/02/health/la-he-skeptic-electronic-cigarettes-20100802</p>

Why am I not surprised a Zeitard would buy into a scam like e-cigarettes.

I've been hoping to get more fights between TZMers and libtards, but our government agent left and the last pages of the thread were rather dull. One statement caught my attention though:

Scarcity resulted from money is not an axiom; it's a fact.

I think I want a "Why do people laugh at TZM" thread.

I guess the argument is that e-cigs don't allow for much nicotine absorption. I was thinking about getting one for nicotine-free juices, just for flavor.