Skeptic Project

The issue That the article in Appeared in question was sighted - probably briefly - and Commended by Peter Joseph before publication, but after criticism from negative Receiving it, I Demanded immediate removal of the article within 24 hours or I would disassociate entertained by the Australian chapter.

The Zeitgeist Movement in Australia burgeoned to approximately 12,000 volunteer / members a few years after the launch of the Movement in 2008. Over 4 years it Became one of many very active chapters around the world Advocating sustainability with almost every major city around the country hosting Including various promotional activities the local leg of TVP's World Lecture Tour, premiere screenings of Zeitgeist movies, Zdays, Zeitgeist Media Festivals and regulate monthly chapter meetings, and other actions. The Became Australian high-profile coordinators in the TZM Global-level structure and worked tirelessly for the Movement's goals. They adhered to and Contributed to development of the Movement's protocols. In this report I describe the crises of confidence in the Global administration of TZM by some of the core volunteers of the Australian Chapter That led to Their departure and the downsizing of the chapter at the end of 2012 as I experienced it as a Brisbane Chapter Co-coordinator.


City Chapters Appeared around Australia after the release of Addendum, With Most activity remarkable in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Adelaide. The Sydney chapter ACTED as Coordinated national chapter by David Z, until Kari MacGregor joined forces in 2010. During this time, They provided support for chapter coordinators, newly-forming chapter volunteers and for project-team-leaders, activism and the promotion of sustainability. We Witnessed Their tireless Efforts and dedication. At no time were there complaints from Regarding volunteers coordination of the national chapter. The national coordinators always ACTED with calm, book, patience and 'professionalism'. However, lines of communication Between global, regional and national chapters were sometimes unclear and there was an apparent lack of direction due to inconsistencies and frequent reinventing of the wheel at city ​​chapter level. The national coordinators made valiant attempts The to Provide guidance to city ​​chapters to Compensate for this. It was unclear to this city chapter coordinator (at least) who populated the Global Chapter Administration or How They operated in terms of develop developing protocols (ie the Global Core Team) started until our national coordinators lifting the veil in early 2012

As 2012 progressed and the Australian national chapter coordinators took more Responsibility at the global level, it Became apparent diferencias That there were in administrative style emerging. The existing Global-level Administrators were accustomed to keeping high-level information about The membership and organization groups on a need-toknow basis. Reasons for this are unclear but possibly May They include a belief in it being more efficient and to protect Organisers from disruption by members of a distorted society. The Australian coordinators found this at odds With The trust-building ethos of the movement and Sought Greater transparency and accountability.


Problems with the Colombian chapter led to the setting in motion of an external chapter review, as per TZM protocols required to reach Rational Consensus. The Australian Chapter coordinator Conducted the review and found That, even before it was completed, Global Administrators disregarded the Rational Consensus process by stacking meetings and, far from Applying reason and reserving judgment, tended towards staff and emotional attacks on the Australian coordinator over the Colombian chapter review, aspects Of which were apparently not to Their liking. Eventually, however we, the GCA subsequently DECIDED unanimously to approve continuation of the Colombian chapter based on the review. The end crunch came after the publication of an article by one of the coordinators, of an article debunking The Venus Project in a 'myth-busting' themed issue of Spirit of the Times, a magazine produced and edited by the coordinators With The collaboration of many Geisters and non-Geisters. Over seven issues, it had put out a vast amount of valuable, wellresearched information and established its own readership inside and outside the Movement. While the magazine was made available on the TZMAu website, it is Essentially an independent project. Since the beginning of 2012, it has not borne any logos TZM, nor Stated that is it produced by TZM, it has only Referred to a loose coalition of sustainabilityoriented volunteers as contributors, compliers and producers. The issue That the article in Appeared in question was sighted - probably briefly - and Commended by Peter Joseph before publication, but after criticism from negative Receiving it, I Demanded immediate removal of the article within 24 hours or I would disassociate entertained by the Australian chapter.

This unilateral action by Peter Joseph is at Odds With His claim that 'TZM is what people personally make of it ', or That TZM is' leaderless'. Even though the Australian chapter, after an emergency meeting, Decided to Comply With The demand, the national coordinators were summarily cut off from all communication networks with Global-level administration, without consultation. The chapter website, however it, Remained linked to the global website.

Peter Joseph TZM regards as, to quote him Directly, 'a thought experiment', and 'the ultimate anti-institution '(Joe Rogan Show, Jan 2012). Unfortunately, Therefore, it is not That chapter coordinators find surprising starting from scratch Themselves When setting up a new chapter or harnessing the energy of new volunteers. This energy is dissipated soon, to Witnessed pattern time and time again. This results in the Movement's inertia and more recently, an exodus of talent, Cliff Faber of Vancouver being a case in point, not to mention members of chapters in other parts of the world like Spain and South America. The problems of dissipating energy and flagging memberships were addressed by Cliff in a letter to PJ on October 15, 2010, and Recognised by Numerous other volunteers more significant recently. Essentially, it pointed out the problems of pretending to be leaderless, When what is needed to harness the energy of Those inspired and motivated to build the Movement is a straight-forward, global corporate-like structure with the Time Dedication - not Money Dedication - values ​​and principles of the Movement at its heart. (For example, This would mean there would be no need for permanent TZM bank accounts.) However, Peter Joseph apparently prefers to intervene personally, to over-rule what people are making of 'his' movement, when it is not to his liking, or When he is erroneously held responsible for its / their activity. Perhaps it is not surprising That the challenges of building a global organization demand skills beyond the experience of a talented film-maker artist, but That was always the gamble of taking an Ideal or cause embodied in a documentary film into the reality of public action. If it can be Recognised That the choice of people in key positions who form the locus of Control early in the Movement's teething phase is crucial, and That They can Be Replaced as more experienced and capable people step forward, then there is hope for the Movement's future.
Especially What is unfortunate is how, so far, short-sightedness has squandered the opportunity to harness the inspiration of the greatest mass movement in history, for Which Rightly Peter can take credit. One can only hope That the Movement gets a second chance, and Takes it. However, it seems, more likely now That a broad coalition of like-minded Movements will carry forward the cause of sustainability, With TZM Among them, rather than leading them.

Simon Cole

Queensland / Brisbane 2009-2012 Chapter Co-coordinator

11 February, 2013

Offensive and non-official TZM material being circulated as official on a TZM chapter website will warrent a request for voluntary removal. As in this case (Main Australia Website), if, after the request is made, the chapter decides it wishes to keep the offensive or unofficial material on its site - it has the option to doso, but simply will not be linked as a portal representing an official chapter.

In the case of Australia, several coordinators were upset at the request and refused cooperation with it. It should be noted that a small group of coordinators in Australia

1) were highly critical of TZM activism as defined by the existing chapter's guide and wished to alter it prior to this event, without success

2) were disrespectful in their use of Peter Joseph's personal name to promote a slander article about TVP without Peter's approval or permission and they used a chapter newsletter to put one coordinator's personal rant/slander material against another organization out as if it were supported by all of TZM (which it isn't)- this is activity contrary to TZMs purpose as defined in the TZM chaper's guide

3) refused to remove the material when Peter, backed by other chapters/members, requested it

4) are leaving official volunteer positions of the movement BY THEIR OWN CHOICE, and not by demand of Peter or anyone else in the movement

5) Are now using this event as a means to attempt to discredit the movement overall, and stir additional drama among TZM (and TVP) activists 

Please note: some of the now-former Australian coordinators have created their own non-profit organizations/projects that actively seek volunteers or project funding from TZM / TVP supporters by posing as a preferred alternative RBE focused organization/projects. These projects are unrelated to TZM or TVP. 

TZM Australian Chapter

True TZM awareness activism is still going on in Australia. New coordinator contacts will surface in time via the standard application process and the global network communication will be reinstated as soon as possible. 

For information on 'top secret' TZM procedures as pulled together from TZM Global Administration over four years, visit: http://www.tzmchapters.net/index.php/chapters/guide


jenwild (USA Coord)

I personally and completely deny jenwild allegations (dated 25/02/2013), and much less her subject and points referring as: "Biased, Limited Viewpoint", also as "Offensive and non-official TZM material", to the uploaded report from Simon Cole, who legitimately was a recognised Australian Chapter Coordinator for TZM (subject in question). Furthermore, I have published and translated this document after reviewing and witnessed abuses with overwhelming 
EVIDENCES from other (now) former "TZM official coordinators" published here: http://archive.org/search.php?query=uploader%3A%22kari%40transitionmediaprint.org%22&sort=-publicdate >>>here: <<< http://archive.org/details/KariMcgregorsResignationFromTheZeitgeistMovement , >>> and here: <<< http://archive.org/details/ApenadaCartaDeRenunciaAlMovimientoZeitgeist&nbsp;
as refuting every single one of the 5 points written by jenwild with those evidences.

The intention of this publication was not to diminish anyone in particular, or the entire TZM as a whole, but instead to rise questions -based on the evidences presented- to challenge the actual Global Core Team and global Chapter administration, their protocols in a more public, open arena, with respect and free-speech basis, bringing about solutions and clear stands within a transparent platform. 

Please admins of Archive.org: simply read the tenor of respect as how this report was written. Also, I would appreciate if it is NOT removed, to allow rational consensus and critical analysis of all parties involved for the betterment of the same TZM. Thank you. Yours sincerely. 
Brujo

--------------------------------------------------------
Please, add your suggestions but DO NOT erase/delete or change anything written by other participants, so everyone's perspectives and suggestions are respected, whist it is possible to refer to what was done before. Just add your suggestions besides, in another paragraph, but with another color highlight.

I strongly suggest to thoroughly read in advance, the main page " Newbie's Guide" of the Spanish Linguistic team on: https://sites.google.com/site/equipolinguisticozeitgeist/guianuevos Please , try to be brief and concise, using the "critical thinking" and do not forget to add your 'Nick' and date between parenthesis at the end of each suggestion. Thank you very much -

(Brujo, 21-01-11)

NOTICE: the following, is in no way a condemnation to the work and contribution of the current coordinators and participants. On the contrary, we deeply thank and recognize their dedication and organization, despite of the tremendous pressure they have to stand with the recent "tsunami" of new people, the "ZMF" translation and the proximity of the New year and Holidays period.



>> PROPOSAL: to propose an structured revision and expansion plan of the Spanish Linguistic team such as:
a) points suggestion to be added to the actual "Qs & As", expanding the current " Newbie's Guide" on: https://sites.google.com/site/equipolinguisticozeitgeist/guia-nuevos
b) to distribute other relevant discussion points and analysis through another web pages of the Spanish Linguistic team, according to relevance of the topics.

>> PLANNING: this is just an "hypothesis" or a "Working Plan". In light of an undeniable ZM + activism growth, collaborators, etc; I believe it is necessary to anticipate some Spanish LT structural reinforcements , minimizing some current difficulties and hidden dangers that may arise in later time. The aim of this working plan is to stimulate a greater participation and suggestions from all translators and proofreaders (PRs), in a synergic approach, to be added to the existing website for the Spanish LT. In this way, everyone who is makingn contributions with their own valuable time and love for the translations and PRs work, plus the new participants who continue to approach us, will know -step-by-step- all the process involved in our work. So, we will maximize benefits in terms of quality (as priority), speed of translations & PRs (avoiding lengthy delays); and minimizing any chance of wasted or surplus work among translators & PRs that cooperate in Spain, Latin America or any other Spanish-spoken country.


>> OBJETIVES & BENEFITS:
 Doubts elimination: by a simple access to common consultations. In this way, all explanations are clear, ordinate, and available for all participants in a permanent way. Also, the need from coordinators to have to repeat over and over again the same explanations will be avoided, no matter if they are verbal or written, for those that are late or were not able to access the online meetings. In addition, all possible risk of misunderstandings will be avoided, or perhaps those same participants having to insist requesting extraordinary meetings with coordinators.

 Approach of all Spanish and Latin American countries -without exceptionworking on teams, through group consultations with decisions clearly defined by the group; avoiding further formation of translators & PRs. sub-groups outside of the "official" ZM LT. In addition, duplication or multiplication of films and texts are minimized, avoiding confusions and misunderstandings by syntax's linguistic mistakes for the public in general.

 Distribution: in a more efficient way of tasks for TZM & TVP by a priority set, as listed in: http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/wiki/index.php?title=LT_Priority_List through task-concentration and break-up in groups through lists, tables, or any other available tool, etc.

 Harmony: encouraged between participants, giving incentive to participation and mutual co-operation, based in redundancy, available for all participants together with the coordinators.

 Redundancy (replacements) , applying a rotating system: a) in all levels, including coordinators as well as sub-coordinators such as translation, Prs.- distribution tasks, in accordance to each linguistic level and time availability for each participant. b) in translators and PRs, in this way, the risk of work-overload (for 'a' and 'b') will be alleviated. Also, the exclusion of those new who wish to participate in some way in translations and PRs. will be also avoided. The main benefits will be workflow and continuity , without stopping translations or final PRs. for those translations that since a long time are on a waiting list or as a priority. In addition, those that are "in a hurry" are going to be discouraged on doing so, even for those that (with some justification) believe that some translations are way too delayed, have decided to take on their own that task, creating a chaotic situation or a hindrance to the "official' Spanish LT work with other versions available for the public domain.

 Transparency of activities, by the "critical thinking" objectivity, through surveys to all translators and PRs involved. Answer anticipation, responding to all possible FAQs, as mentioned above. Thus, avoidance of question repetitions by the 'new' and 'old' participants, possible misunderstandings, confusions, etc. All this is possible instead of having to wait to formulate these questions of the Spanish LT on Team Speak (TS) periodically, whereas often many days have to be waited for, when the time available is also limited due to international variations , participant excesses or absences for reasons beyond their control, or by other priorities that may leave many questions without answers. So, if a ZM participant/activist needs to be absent, he/she still will have access to that information on the SLT, on the Qs & As. and to be able to check them in their own time. If further queries or the need of further clarifications arise, then the coordinators will respond to them.


>> METODOLOGY - STRUCTURE:
 Avoidance of "unknown" participants, through a clear description/chart of the group coordinator for Spanish. Names (or Nicks') and tasks of each, published on lists available to everyone, named by each Spanish-speaking country. Additionally, names of other -possiblecoordinators of the SLT in other countries.

 Selection criteria , for participants experience-level determination. Who decides upon such criteria?

 Responsible people for final PRs on film and texts. Who are they? Indentify individuals or groups. Thus, everyone knows who are responsible according to the experience level, ensuring transparency and peace of mind of final works.

 Teams: determination of individuals involved in translations and PRs. Works.

 Number: determination of individuals involved just on PRs. works for final
decisions.

 Extraordinary Meetings , may be needed among proofreaders (PRs) of all (Spanish) countries, to co fraternize and to get to know each other, to discuss linguistic aspects in common, possible difficulties, tasks, etc.

 Prioritize , translations and PRs tasks on lists, according to the Linguistic Wiki on: http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/wiki/index.php?title=LT_Priority_List

 Ongoing tasks , translations and PRs tasks on lists, for access viewing to everyone.

 Pending Issues , to be discussed in forums, TS, and GG mail. Some examples:

What is happening with the Activisty Orientation Guide? Any more PRs needed on top of the ones already done? Let's say: there are 3 or 4 PRs with suggestions already (in Pootle)...what is next? WHO and HOW they do the "final" revision? What is going on with the definite PR of "Addendum"? Is in fact another PR going ahead? When? Who are participating? (I never got a clear answer about this!...) What is the reason of so much delay? , when there are so many new people (after watching "ZMF"), logically would like to watch the previous PJ's films. So, what is the way out of this dilemma is the original 'author' who placed it in DotSub 1st. cannot be found? Are we going to leave it just like that?

Is the new Pootle 2.0 ready to be used? When can we start practicing with it? The old one is too slow, and often hangs.

 Other issues: (please, write here any suggestions, or pending topics you would like to be considered).

 Surveys: about finished (the most relevant) translation works applying a "critical thinking" process, giving way to an active participation, criticism and corrections about: general coordination, methodology, communication, participation among all Spanish-speaking countries, translations, syntax, modes, localisms, etc. to the most significant translation works done. (i.e. most recent films)

 Incentive: to all participants, to participate with suggestions, within a creative and integrative framework, without blindly accepting anything 'established'; and to ask on TS or in any other group meeting if further queries remain in respect to any topic.

 Estrangement , of potential division among ZM activists: there are people that -in parallel- are already doing translations of films and texts in Spanish without consultation with the SLT. Here questions arise: why is this happening?, if there are people that are unhappy with the current SLT...why is this?, are there special exceptions?...So, what is the sense of the work done by the "official" SLT, if other people are doing this on their own and later (as an example) they upload those works on YouTube, Dotsub?. This kind of parallel activity are an open door for further confusions, being released to the public domain without being labeled as "official" by the ZM. These very same people do other translations of texts and share them among friends, in Google Docs., etc. Suggestion: perhaps an 'extraordinary' meeting with the "older" participants will be needed to discuss with Ray (G-man), Vixi, etc. regarding the people involved or somehow 'responsible', trying to unify energies to determine and to minimize the issue. In case this case has been addressed earlier, I would strongly suggest to re-organize another meeting, including those new participants that may be noticing the same problem.

 Education to the existing and new members about the reasons of the need to work only within the SLT, avoiding parallel translations.

>> CONCLUSION: encouragement of all SLT participants about the need of a combinedunconditional participation, where their shared love, time and energy within the ZM-SLT, of not being dissipated or fragmented; but rather unified instead, through a growing synergy effect.

(Brujo, 21-01-11)

**** Please comment OBJECTIVES. If no alternative or better suggestions,
share with your ID and date, without deleting anything. Thanks ******

Chapters protocol
https://docs.google.com/document/d/157n6J3qXvS7ySM1k5VX4mCIbQ1_3bPiPNIzCcclZxT0/edit?hl=en_US&pli=1

Coordination Protocol:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KaQdOopphR7UV3-UCKFG725QLfkA5YNqZlQMqgd6g4/
edit?hl=en_US

Points of interest:

 1.3 - Chapter tiers
Original: +1

a) Chapters administration - Composed of international coordinators
Propuesta 1: +1-1

a) Chapters administration - Composed of chapter coordinators from all the chapters that want to participate. The meetings of the chapters administration must be open, but well moderated.

b) Chapter administration -
SELECTION PANEL CRITERIA & PROCEDURES: ..........(SUGGESTIONS)..................

 Criteria Basis: must be similar as stipulated on (#2. Coordination Requirements), based on a world-wide consensual "horizontal and holographic" structure. A "TZM International Board" (or any other name may deemed to be necessary) may needed to be conformed by all possible international chapter coordinators to elect the Chapter-admin and global coordinator candidates.

 Election-time periods : (i.e. each 1, 2, 3 years, etc) where the participants are from each major country chapters (i.e. each country chapter from Europe, USA, Latin America, Australia, etc), must be clearly defined allowing a reasonable time preparation, to the event that internal discussions related to ballots can take place from TZM activists on each country.

 Ballot methods : to be applied, those must be clearly defined in a transparent way worldwide(i.e. online with proposed Chapter admin names where each country coordinator, after consultation -or internal ballot- places his/her vote by suggesting the proposed candidates).

 Ballot process : must be consensual and available for general public viewing (but only chapter coordinators for each country are able to place the vote).

 Code of Conduct: must be respected on TZM ethical principles, allowing consensual reviewprocess of all international chapter coordinators in case of misconduct or serious allegations.

 Conflict of interests: their potential must be minimized when selecting individuals as
TZM chapter's admins in order to avoid any chance of human resources (and volunteers) manipulation that may favor other institutions, political, philosophical, religious organizations, businesses, etc. that may slow down or be detrimental for TZM's activism.

 Administrative rights scope: their powers on IRC chats (i.e. TeamSpeak3, official website, Forum Moderation, etc) must abide by the specific existing Protocols in place, but subject to approval of the TZM International Board, who may decide to overturn any (chapter-admin individual) decisions if there are sufficient ground to do so. In any case decision making processes should become 'excessive' to the point of becoming a bureaucratic hindrance for the speedy flow of TZM's activism at all levels.

 Decision making processes: any chapter-admin or global coordinator or co-coordinator should not be allowed to be the only responsible one alone. Critical decisions must be dealt in consultation with international chapter coordinators prior these implementations take place (i.e. creation or removal from TZM of any "official" Linguistic Team, change of IRC chat servers, change or removal of website international Forums, 'key' web pages creation, further protocol revision/changes, etc).

 Transparency: those processes must be published (i.e. email to activists, official and chapter websites, etc, through communication channels clearly defined) available for all activist perusal.

 Redundancy & reviews: allowance for replacement criteria in case of absences, workload alleviate/distribution; and review processes to be implemented in case of suspicious cases, failures or loopholes on the chapter admin decision implementation.

 Complaints management: although transparency must be allowed, discretion is also required for issues, failures or misconduct cases that may arise with chapter-admins. All complaints -at this level- must be handled by the "TZM International Board" as follows:

 Lodgement: "where and how" (i.e. a Form must be publicly available on the official TZM website)- If it is a 'general' complaint, can be dealt by the chapter-admins themselves; whereas if it is related to any chapter administrator or a chapter-admin individual, must be directed to the TZM International Board.

 Handling & Investigation: processes must be clarified in a similar manner as specified further below...(revise & complete).....................

 Consultation: with all possible international chapter coordinators and people involved in the complaints or issues.

 Decision, appeal process & disciplinary remedial actions: must only be dealt at TZM International Board level, based on TZM's ethical principles.

 Legal: because of potential hidden risks -at local and International levels-, whereas misconduct of chapter-admin individuals, conflict of interests, political, copyright breaches, etc. may occur, there is a need to stress on abiding by each local country and international Law systems to prevent human errors, complications, unlawful misconduct or sabotages that may be detrimental to TZM. To that effect, strong emphasis must be placed in those candidates about their general cultural level, life experience, social interaction or "people's skills", moderation capacity, realistic time availability for TZM activism, coordination experience, adaptation and -most importantly- unbiased point of view analysis capability. Professional legal background and backup may be relevant as TZM grows...(revise & complete).....................

OBJECTIVES & BENEFITS: ...(To show the positive side in changing these protocols)

 Approach of all global chapters working on teams, through group consultations with coordinators and chapter admins on consensual decisions clearly defined by all; avoiding further conflicts because of differences in philosophical approach.

 Incentives: for all to participate within a creative and integrative framework, without blindly accepting anything "established from the top". So, this framework provides the incentive to ask questions in respect to any topic that may be unclear.

 Distribution: in a more efficient way of tasks for TZM of all coordinators and chapteradmins world-wide through task-concentration.

 Transparency: the "critical thinking" approach will be encouraged while applying objectivity through periodical surveys to all TZM activists about chapter admin and coordinators performances. In addition, all possible FAQs, will be on web pages, accessible to everyone, to avoid repetitions. In addition, all possible risk of misunderstandings or distortions will be avoided, or perhaps those same participants having to insist requesting extraordinary meetings with coordinators and chapter-admins.

 Harmony: encouraged between TZM participants at all levels of responsibilities, giving incentive to participate in mutual co-operation, based in redundancy, available for all while avoiding wearing out energies from any individuals. Therefore, we are all responsible on a same level.

...(revise & complete).....................

CONCLUSION: ..........(WHY IT IS IMPERATIVE TO IMPLEMENT THESE CHANGES) Encouragement of all TZM activists to get involved at all chapter-admin and coordination levels whenever possible, even to open new chapters. This encourages further combined-unconditional participation plus suggestions than can be of a great benefit. Thus, all shared love, time and energy within TZM will no longer be ignored, dissipated or fragmented; but unified instead, through a growing synergy effect within an horizontal and holographic framework world-wide.

(Brujo, 21/03/12)

Please comment **** OBJECTIVES. If no alternative or better suggestions, share with your ID and date, without deleting anything. Thanks ******

 # 3. Criteria for removal of official status (I suggest that this title should be clarified because can lead to misinterpretations. It should define what is or is not "official" MZ)

(Brujo, 21/03/12)

CCC

Please comment **** OBJECTIVES. If no alternative or better suggestions, share them with your ID and date, without deleting anything. Thanks ******
 
# 3. Criteria for removal of official status (I suggest that this title should be clarified because it can lead to misinterpretations. Should define what is or is not "official" MZ)
 
Original:
Each situation is Analyzed in a per case basis by the coordinator (s) Directly responsible for the tier above, for example:
Analysis of a city chapter is made by the coordinator (s) of the region where its situated
Analysis of a regional chapter is made?? By the coordinator (s) of the country / chapter where it is situated
Analysis of a national chapter is made by the global administration chapters who wrote this? Please clarify
 
Proposal 1: +1 +1
 
The situation is Analyzed by the coordinator (s) Directly responsible for the tier above, And Also active members of the tier above (excluding the members of the chapter subject to removal). The members of the chapter subject to removal can Participate in the discussion but They Can not take part in the decision.
For example, the analysis of a subchapter is made?? By the coordinator (s) of the chapter where it is situated and Also by the active members of the chapter (excluding the members of the subchapter subject to removal; They Can Participate in the discussion but They Can not take part in the decision).
 
The situation is analyzed by the / the coordinator / s directly responsible for the top layer, and so active members of the upper layer (excluding members of the chapter subject to disposal). Chapter members subject to removal can participate in the discussion but can not take part in the decision.
For example, analysis of a subchapter (subchapter) is done by coordinators chapter where it is located and also the chapter members (excluding members of subchapter subject to removal, can participate in the discussion, but they can not take sides in decision).
 
Proposal healthy discarded by Turns the desired goal:
The situation is willing Analyzed by every active member Zeitgeist, the final decision is made by the coordinators and active members of the chapters of the tier (s) above.
 
Proposal 2: -1
For example, analysis of a chapter Chapter coordinators perform superior chapter members also deleted. The decision depends only on the chapter coordinators and members of the upper layer.
The analysis is performed by a field coordinators members and higher level. The decision will be open to members in question, but depends only on the chapter members and coordinators of the top layer.
 
______________________________
 
# 4. The process of chapter review
 
Original:
 
In simpler terms, the process of chapter review is Generally a routine check of a chapter Given Described based upon the criteria above in points # 2 and # 3. Such review is Carried out by a coordinator who is responsible específicamente For such tasks in a chapter. The process of chapter review May be triggered by issues Perceived via observation, complaints, and / or reports.
 
Upon entering the process of chapter review the coordinator will take the Following steps:
 
Proposal 1:
 
In simpler terms, the process of chapter review is Generally a routine check of a Given chapter. Such review is Carried out by the coordinators and active members of the chapter. The process of chapter review May be triggered by issues Perceived via observation, complaints, and / or reports.
 
Upon entering the process of chapter review the Following steps will be taken:
 
 
 
 
__________________
 
 
# 2. Coordination Requirements
 
These Processes Following Requirements and approval apply only to chapter coordinators and team overall. A project manager needs only to create and manage a special project approved.
 
For someone who volunteers to assume the role of coordination is required the Following:
History of good conduct and respect for the protocols
Have read the coordination protocol
Be interviewed, reviewed, and approved by the coordination Directly responsible for the chapter
Be interviewed, reviewed, and approved by the active members of the tier responsible for the chapter
Explicit agreement by the volunteer to respect and abide by the rules of conduct and Movement protocols
 
Coupled With These Requirements, to assume Could coordinator Given Their role in the Following ways:
 
(A) When no coordinator exists, They are selected via rational consensus of the active chapter members and approval of the upper-tier active members. The approval can not be denied Unless the selection of a specific coordinator is against the aims and basic agreements of TZM.
 
(B) When a coordinator or a team of coordinators already exists the approval of a volunteer for the role of coordinator is by consensus of the team.
 
(B) When a coordinator or a team of coordinators already exists, the approval of an adittional coordinator must follow the same rules above.
 
(C) Intervention of the overall administration chapters to upper-tier or chapter coordinator (in case it includes the removal of a pre-existing coordinator).
 
In order to Maintain the status of a coordinator it is Necessary to:
- Respect and Comply With The coordination protocol in a consistent Manner
- Respect the rules of conduct
- When required reports Provide
- Represent and / or representation in meetings where Facilitate Presence is required
 
Failure to Adhere to any of the aforementioned points will lead to the coordinator being placed "under trial" and Analyzed by the Individual (s) Directly responsible for the region in Which the chapter is located. This analysis May Come from the chapter members who contact the upper tier coordinator of the region (or chapters overall administration), or a routine check Carried out by the aforementioned.
 
Failure to Adhere to any of the aforementioned points will lead to the coordinator being placed "under trial" and Analyzed by the active members of the region in Which the chapter is located.
 
 
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
-
====================================
 
Original document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k6IIcSuDLCWqhG_Vbu4Ey-ZaXbVNyDiflX6b-8-FwOM/edit?hl=es
 
Place in Forum: http://www.zeitgeistlatino.org/foros/viewforum.php?f=160
 
The methodology is actually living the original text and proposals. Make your suggestions in the first place in the forum for everyone to see, review and discuss them. Later included on the pad in the corresponding section. Please explain your best writing and voice discuss it if they can avoid writing.
 
 
================================================== ======================

================================================== ======================
PROPOSAL Cristian (Chile)
1. Chapters in the Zeitgeist Movement:
 
The Zeitgeist Movement has built a structure organized into chapters to facilitate dissemination of the Zeitgeist Movement towards a resource based economy, as well as the flow of information among activists.
 
 
PROPOSALS:
 
1. Chapters MZ:
The MZ has built a structure organized into chapters (linguistic or geographical) to carry out the means to get an EBR, as well as facilitate communication between equipos.-1 (not making unnecessary changes) (-1 linguistics is a working not a chapter Cristian (Chile) or chapters refer to spoken language?)
 
PROPOSAL
1. A Chapter in the Zeitgeist Movement.
MZ has built a structure organized into chapters to facilitate collective activism an organized manner, and the flow of information on a wide variety of members. -1
 
 
================================================== ======================
ORIGINAL
1.1 Definition:
A chapter is defined as a group of active members of the Zeitgeist Movement in a region it serves and works as a faithful representation of the Movement in their respective regions.
================================================== ======================
PROPOSAL Cristian (Chile)
1.1 Definition:
A chapter is defined as a group of active people Zeitgeist Movement in a region it serves and works as a representation of the Movement in their respective regions.
 
 
PROPOSAL
1.1.Definición:
A chapter is a group of activists in a geographic region or linguistic represents the MZ. There are several areas of chapters: by continent, by country, by region, etc ... -1 (no unnecessary changes) (+1 to add linguistics) (-1 linguistics is a team not a chapter Cristian (Chile) )
 
PROPOSAL
1.1 Definition:
A chapter is defined as a group of active members of the Zeitgeist Movement in a geographic region or particular language works and functions as a faithful representation of the Movement in their respective regions.
 
1. Chapters of the Zeitgeist Movement:
 
The Zeitgeist Movement (MZ) is organized into chapters covering some activists from geographical or linguistic area. +1-1
The Zeitgeist Movement is organized internally and with each other through chapters comprising activists of a certain geographical or linguistic.
 
As well as the information flow relative / relevant to a wide range of members.
(Original gives the idea of ​​facilitating communication. This document is intended to facilitate the organization to facilitate all communication included). (Outperforms previous writing it).
I would prefer not to use the word relative, rather relevant to members (ie members a range of limited I think)
 
understood as activism? propose to be the set of all actions necessary to carry out an EBR in a given territory)
Definition of activist is requested? proposal: all the actions necessary to achieve overall EBR. Activist definition does not fit in this section, perhaps not in this document.
 
The function of a chapter is to create and maintain a work environment, communication, information and resource sharing, mutual support and promotion oriented activism (in function of achieving EBR) according to the guidelines set forth in mission Zeitgeist Movement . It also has the function of a part of the overall structure of the movement to integrate projects, information, and creation of the conditions necessary to promote a EBR in a territory together determinadoy activism to a level above this.
The truth of the understandings I look deeper, I think the understandings that are the reason for the guidelines, but that's just semantics.
 
 
================================================== ======================
ORIGINAL
1.2 - Function:
The function of a chapter is to create and maintain a work environment oriented activism that can be performed in accordance with the understandings supported by motion. It is also part of an overall chapter structure for information and activism to a higher level.
================================================== ======================
PROPOSAL Cristian (Chile)
1.2 - Function:
The function of a chapter is to create and maintain a work environment oriented activism that can be performed in accordance with the understandings supported by the Movement. It is also part of an overall chapter structure for information and activism to a higher level.
 
PROPOSAL
1.2 - Function:
The function of a chapter is to create and maintain a work environment oriented activism that can be performed in accordance with the understandings supported by motion. It is also part of a global chapter structure for information and activism to a higher level.
 
PROPOSAL
1.2.Función:
Its function is to create and maintain optimal communication between teams and anywhere you need comunicación.-1 (not doing unnecessary changes)
 
 
 
================================================== ======================
ORIGINAL
1.3 Scope / Level of Chapter:
a) Chapters Administration - Composed of the International Coordinators
b) National Chapters - Organized by the country (eg Portugal, Italy, France)
c) Regional Chapter - Organized by Region / District / Province
d) Chapters Town - Organized by the City
================================================== ======================
 
PROPOSAL Cristian (Chile)
1.3 Chapter Organization:
a) Global MZ: Composed of the International Coordinators.
b) Continental MZ: MZ Europe, Latin MZ, MZ Asia, Africa MZ, MZ Oceania ...
c) National MZ: each country in which the MZ is active.
d) Regional MZ:
e) Local Chapters
 
It's okay to talk about levels? May imply that the coord. of a higher level is "above" the coord. of a lower level, as it has greater decision-making authority for the chapter.
 
PROPOSAL
1.3.Ámbitos chapter: (no unnecessary changes)
a) MZ Global: consists of all the activists in the world.
b) Continental MZ: MZ Europe, Latin MZ, MZ Asia, Africa MZ, MZ Oceania ...
c) National MZ: each country in which the MZ is active.
d) Regional MZ:
e) Local Chapters
 
PROPOSAL
Chapter 1.3 level:
a) Chapters globally Administration - International Coordinators Composed all the globally active members
b) Chapters by language field.
c) National Chapters - Organized by the country (eg Portugal, Italy, France)
d) Regional Chapter - Organized by Region / District / Province
e) Chapters Town - Organized by the City
 
 
 
Alternatives to level (for chapter): fields, layers
 

- WHAT TOP INCLUDED IN OTHER PROPOSALS -
 
1.3. Levels geographic / linguistic: (only or also by whom mention is made)
a) Global
b) Nationals
c) Regional
d) Local
e) Other: university, etc. -1-1
 
 
A chapter is defined as a group of active members of the Zeitgeist Movement in a geographic region or particular language works and functions as a faithful representation of the Movement in their respective regions.
 
================================================== ======================
ORIGINAL:
Two. Criteria for the formalization:
 
The term "official" used in the context of the chapters means that a chapter of The Zeitgeist Movement is checked and approved in order to ensure an accurate representation of the movement in their respective area.
 
- The minimum requirements for a chapter:
Coordinator / is active and approved.
A dedicated email chapter affairs.
A point of communication over the Internet (a website, a group or a mailing list. (The more surround is the area of ​​the chapter, for example, national chapters, more stringent the requirements for Internet communication.)
Signs of the previous activity (meetings at local events as projections., And / or participation in projects organized movement)
================================================== ======================
PROPOSAL Cristian (Chile)
Two. Criteria for the formalization:
 
The term "official" is used to verify and approve a chapter to ensure an accurate representation of the Zeitgeist Movement lineamiestos in a locality or area in question.
 
- The minimum requirements for a chapter:
Coordinator / s assets and recognized or accredited.
A dedicated email chapter affairs.
A point of communication over the Internet (a website, a group or a mailing list).
(The more surround is the area of ​​the chapter, for example, national chapters, more stringent the requirements for Internet communication.)
Signs of the previous activity (meetings at local events as projections., And / or participation in projects organized movement)
 
The coordination team is responsible for officially credited as chapters, coordinators or any kind of activity of the local Zeitgeist Movement.
____________
 
PROPOSALS:
Two. Criteria for the formalization:
 
The term "official" used in the context of the chapters means that a chapter of The Zeitgeist Movement is checked and approved in order to ensure an accurate representation of the movement in their respective area.
 
In the context of the chapters of MZ, officer means it has been tested and approved to ensure an accurate representation of the same.
 
representation is not faithful, is setting the ethical limits proposed by the movement to achieve an EBR)
(This suggestion is not relevant to breaches of our minds right?)
the original term "accurated" can be better translated "concise" or "accurate"
 
- The minimum requirements for a chapter:
 
    Coordinator / is active / s and approved / s.
    A dedicated email chapter affairs.
    A point of communication over the Internet (a website, a group or a mailing list. Higher chapter level, for example, national chapters, more stringent the requirements for Internet communication.)
    Signs of the previous activity (meetings at local events as projections., And / or participation in projects organized movement)
 
 Verified approved instead??? +1 +1 +1 (Team coordinator rather facilitators) -1 (which is team of facilitators?) -1 Clarified theme facilitator Hispanic day meeting October 16, 2011
 
The Member?? Chapter subject to formalization should select a coordinator.
Then the situation is analyzed by the coordinators of the same field, he / coordinators directly responsible for the higher level, and active members of the same scope and higher level / higher, in a coordination meeting to ensure that the proposal meets described requirements to be an officer.
 
The / the coordinator / s for a field are chosen among activists in the same field and then subjected to the approval or ratification of the next higher level, checking is not breached any basic agreement. (Advisory or binding process?
Do not put in the same sentence same scope and higher level, because it leads to confusion. What is the confusion? Can not understand anything
 
 
The Coordination Team for a field?? are chosen from the same? activists area? and then subjected to ratification by the next higher level, checking is not breached any basic agreement.
 
================================================== ======================
ORIGINAL:
Three. Criteria for removal of official status status: [PENDING]
 
Each situation is analyzed on a case by case basis by the / the coordinator / responsible / direct s / s of the upper level, for example:
Analyzing a chapter is executed by the city / the coordinator / s of the region in which it is located.
Introduce a regional analysis is performed by the / the coordinator / s of the country / chapter where it is.
The analysis of a national chapter is done by the global management of the chapters.
 
- The decision of whether to remove the official status uses the following basic criteria:
 
A) Frequency of Activity:
If a particular chapter is inactive at the local level - officially recognized activities comprising events that are aimed at members of the public (external) or members (internal) or actively managed and developed projects.
 
B) The nature of the activity:
If the actions taken by a particular chapter are not aligned with the proper representation and image of the Zeitgeist Movement.
If there is interest agendas mixed doubles in the affairs of the chapter, as the profit motive, or the promotion of a political party, religious agenda, or concepts "new age", etc..
 
C) No information about the activity:
If a particular chapter does not report its activities, and / or constantly fails to be represented at meetings. This is usually due to "poor behavior" or lack of coordination with the chapter in question.
================================================== ======================
 
PROPOSAL: Cristian (Chile)
Three. Criteria for the elimination of official status condition:
 
Each situation is analyzed by the team of coordinators case by case:
The analysis of a chapter of a city is made by the coordinators or the region in which it is located.
Introduce a regional analysis is done by the team of national coordinators.
The analysis of a national chapter is done by the global management of the chapters.
 
- The decision of whether to remove the official status uses the following basic criteria:
 
A) Frequency of Activity:
Inactivity of a chapter depending on your location.
(Officially recognized activities, which includes events that are aimed at the general public or activists)
 
B) The nature of the activity:
Activities that do not represent guidelines Zeitgeist Movement, which
Double mixing participation in the affairs of the Movement as profit promoting any political party or religion, concepts NWO, Etc.
 
C) No information about the activity:
Lack of communication from one chapter to not report on their activities and / or stops constantly to be represented at meetings.
This is usually due to "poor behavior", lack of coordination, or lack of time with the chapter in question.
 
PROPOSALS:
The situation is analyzed by field coordinators, he / coordinators directly responsible for the higher level, and also active members? Scope and higher level? (Excluding chapter members subject to removal), in a meeting.
 
RESPECT THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS:
* DO NOT DELETE OR MODIFY THE ORIGINAL
* ADD DOWN INDICATING THE PROPOSAL ORIGINAL NAME AND COUNTRY.
* TO APPROVE A PROPOSAL MADE BY ANOTHER CHAPTER INDICATE WITH A NAME AND COUNTRY +1, -1 OTHERWISE NAME AND COUNTRY.
* IF THE ADDING A PROPOSAL MAY NOT PARTICIPATE IN MEETINGS HISPANIC MODIFICATION OF PROTOCOLS AND EXPLAIN THE REASONS WHY CREATE STATEMENT MUST CONSIDER YOUR PROPOSAL.
 
Icavot ---> The removal of the officers of a chapter will be decided among the activists immediately broader scope (excluding chapter activists susceptible of elimination, you have voice but not block the decision), in a meeting. +1 +1 +1-1 +1-1
 
Not insist this term shall be understood in Latin America: "the area immediately broader" in Spain in Chile shall mean no.
 
 
 
Erick Z removal or suspension of officers of a chapter will be decided among activists who choose to participate or comply moderators roles. Moderators should be subject consequential to the ideas of motion and this result will be given by their actions and proposals within the movement, (horizontality, desentralizada organization, inclusion, diversity, not leaders) -1 -1 -1-1-1
 
Phantomcyt
The removal or suspension of officers of a chapter will be decided among activists who choose to participate or comply moderators roles. Moderators should be subject consequential to the ideas of motion and this result will be given by their actions and proposals within the movement, Moderators can be both coordinators and activists, activists of the chapter can participate eliminate defending his position, but not entitled to vote. If the chapter is eliminated will be able to raise an appeal to the next higher instance. Participate in the appeal coordinators and activists level up a certain amount of time previously stipulated motion, seeking consensus in the two cases, One could even speak of a 50% +1 vote, whereas in the feedback people participating in the debate. (-1) (+1) (Horizontality, desentralizada organization, inclusion, diversity, not leaders) +1 +1 +1 +1-1 -1-1
 
There are always all to make a decision approve 50% consensus (consensus) +1 http://proyectocultivandovida.pbworks.com/f/Introduccion+al+proceso+de+consenso.pdf That's the consensus. Here we do not like the feedback (ardible)
 
Scope
Scope The term is one that is used to refer to a given perimeter or space, either a space that refers to a place, or a space that relates to terminology.
 
Horizontality
The horizontality is a practice or proposal involves developing organizational or decision-making power to encourage participation or more or less equal between individuals within an organization. The horizontality is optional for an organization and seeks greater interaction in the group to enhance leadership and innovation.
 
Level concept refers to the horizontality of something. For example, a high level is reached or that something is placed. It is also the height reached by the surface of a liquid
 
Layer
Overlay zone to another or others, with which it forms a whole. Layers of the atmosphere in society.
 
 
Cristian, "chapters moderators activists" that scope?????????? the same chapter, the superior realm?
In the same chapter not nationally moderators
Specifies, you have to write to be clear: S. The desoficializacion the moderators decide?!?!?!?!? redactalo more clearly ...
will deliver the information to the national coordination reporting that the chapter is not being functional, mentioning that you should disable
 
Idea: Moderator of chapters, check the functionality of all the chapters, no decisions reports on a chapter not being functional, and coordination should inform, decide or see the steps to follow for that chapter. It is understood?
 
 
Change elimination removed / deleted /
 
================================================== ======================
ORIGINAL:
April. The review process of the chapter:
 
In simple terms, the process of revision of the chapter is generally a routine check of a given chapter, based on the criteria described above in points # 2 and # 3. The review is conducted by a coordinator who is specifically responsible for these tasks in a chapter. The chapter review process can be triggered by problems identified through monitoring, complaints and / or reports.
 
Upon entering the review process chapter coordinator should take the following measures:
 
Step 1 - Gather information:
 
This can be achieved by consultation reports provided by the chapter, visiting and checking the website and media chapter, participating in private conversations with members of various chapters, asking for a more detailed report regarding a certain subject that can arise, etc.
 
Step 2 - Analyze and review information:
 
All information collected current state chapter should be analyzed according to the review criteria. the key issues arising, if any, should be properly identified, and document review should be supported by all available and relevant evidence if necessary. Examples of tests include chat logs, recordings, emails, reports, etc..
 
Step 3 - Take action:
 
With the full review, the next step is to take appropriate action, depending on the conclusion of the review. Such action may take the following forms
 
Simple Report chapter coordinator that everything is in order, and taking note of the review.
Provide notes and tips for necessary improvements to the respective chapter coordinator.
Administrative intervention of higher-level coordination or administration of chapters.
================================================== ======================
 
PROPOSAL: Cristian (Chile)
April. The review process of the chapter:
 
In simple terms, the process of revision of the chapter is generally a routine check of a given chapter, based on the criteria described above in points # 2 and # 3. The review is conducted by the team of coordinators that specifically handles these tasks in a chapter. The chapter review process can be triggered by problems identified through monitoring, complaints and / or reports.
 
Upon entering the review process chapter coordinator should take the following measures:
 
Step 1 - Gather information:
 
This can be achieved by consultation reports provided by the chapter, visiting and checking the website and media chapter, participating in private conversations with members of various chapters, asking for a more detailed report regarding a certain subject that can arise, etc.
 
Step 2 - Analyze and review information:
 
All information collected current state chapter should be analyzed according to the review criteria. On the key issues arising, if any, should be properly identified, and document review should be supported by all available and relevant evidence if necessary. Examples of tests include chat logs, recordings, emails, reports, etc..
 
Step 3 - Take action:
 
With the full review, the next step is to take appropriate action, depending on the conclusion of the review. Such action may take the following forms
 
Simple Report chapter coordinator that everything is in order, and taking note of the review.
Provide notes and tips for necessary improvements to the respective chapter coordinator.
Administrative intervention of national coordination or administration of chapters.
 
PROPOSALS:
In simple terms, chapter review is usually a routine process for a given chapter. Such a review is carried out by coordinators and active members of the chapter. The chapter review process can be triggered by problems identified through monitoring, complaints and / or reports.
 
 
Upon entering the review process will chapter the following measures: blah blah
 
 
WebRep
 
Overall rating
 
 
This site has no rating
(Not enough votes)
 
 
Alternative Proposals under 4.
 
 
    (Erick Osckar Z and ZM)
    April. The chapter review process
In simple terms, the process of revision of the chapter is generally a routine check of a given chapter in terms more suitable correction should call routing prosecution or routine of a chapter, based on the criteria described above in points # 2 and # 3.
 
The review is conducted by a group of coordination or similar that is specifically responsible for these tasks in a chapter. The chapter review process can be triggered by problems identified through monitoring, complaints and / or reports.
 
Upon entering the review process chapter coordinator should take the following measures:

1. A chapter in the Zeitgeist Movement
1.1 - Definition
1.2 - Function
1.3 - Chapter tiers

2. Criteria for officialization

3. Criteria for removal of official status

4. The process of chapter review

#1. A Chapter in the Zeitgeist Movement
The Zeitgeist Movement has an organized structure built upon chapters to facilitate collective activism in an organized manner as well as the flow of information relating to a vast range of members
.
1.1 - Definition
A chapter is defined as a group of active members of the Zeitgeist Movement in a particular region that serves and functions as an accurate representation of the Movement in their respective region.

1.2 - Function
The function of a chapter is to create and sustain a work-oriented environment from which activism can then be performed in accordance with the understandings supported by the movement. It is also part of a global chapter structure for information purposes and larger order activism.

1.3 - Chapter tiers

a) Chapters administration - Composed of international coordinators
a) chapters administration - Composed of international coordinators + representatives from all the
chapters that want to participate in the meetings where decisions are arrived.
b) National chapters - Organized by country (eg: Portugal, Italy, France)
c) Regional chapters - Organized by region / district / state / province
d) City chapters - Organized by city


#2. Criteria for Oficialization
The term "official" used in the context of chapters means that a given chapter of the Zeitgeist Movement is verified and approved in order to ensure an accurate representation of the Movement in their respective area.

Minimum requirements for a chapter:
● (An) approved and active coordinator(s)
● A dedicated email for chapter affairs
● An internet communication point (a Website, group or a mailing list. The higher the chapter tier,
for example national chapter, the stricter the requirements regarding internet communication will be.)
● Signs of previous activity (Local events like meetups, screenings. and/or organized participation in movement projects)

The verification and approval of a chapter oficialiciation will be decided by the activists of the same tier and then submitted to the approval or ratification at the next higher level, checking that there is no breach of any of the basic principles of the movement.

For example, the ratification of a subchapter is decided by the activists in a chapter meeting.


#3. Criteria for removal of official status
Each situation is analyzed in a per case basis by the coordinator(s) directly responsible for the tier above, for example:

● Analysis of a city chapter is made by the coordinator(s) of the region where its situated
● Analysis of a regional chapter is made by the coordinator(s) of the country/chapter where it is situated
● Analysis of a national chapter is made by the global chapters administration

The situation is analyzed by the coordinator(s) directly responsable for the tier above, and also active members of the tier above (excluding the members of the chapter subject to removal).

For example, the analysis of a subchapter is made by the coordinator(s) of the chapter where it is situated and also by the active members of the chapter (excluding the members of the subchapter subject to removal; they can participate in the discussion but they can't take part in the decision).

This decision of whether to remove official status employs the following criteria as its basis:

a) Frequency of activity
● If a particular chapter is inactive at the local level - officially recognized activity comprising events that are geared toward the public (external) or members (internal), or any projects being actively managed and developed, etc.

b) Nature of activity
● If the actions performed by a particular chapter are not aligned with the proper representation and image of the Zeitgeist Movement
● If there are additional agendas and interests involved in chapter affairs, such as profit motives, or the promotion of a political party, religious agenda, or new age concepts, etc.

c) Absence of information on the Activity
● If a given chapter doesn't report their activities, and/or consistently fails to be represented in meetings. This is generally due to "poor conduct" or absence of the coordination for the chapter in question.


#4. The process of chapter review

In simple terms, the process of chapter review is generally a routine check of a given chapter based upon the criteria described above in points #2 and #3. Such review is carried out by a coordinator who is specifically responsible for such tasks in a chapter. The process of chapter review may be triggered by issues perceived via observation, complaints, and/or reports.

Upon entering the process of chapter review the coordinator will take the following steps:

In simple terms, the process of chapter review is generally a routine check of a given chapter. Such review is carried out by the coordinators and active members of the chapter. The process of chapter review may be triggered by issues perceived via observation, complaints, and/or reports.

Upon entering the process of chapter review the following steps will be taken:

Step 1 - Gather information
This can be accomplished by consulting reports provided by the chapter, visiting and checking the chapter website and communication mediums, engaging in private talks with several chapter members, asking for a more in-depth report in relation to a certain issue that may arise. Etc.

Step 2 - Analyze and review the information
With all information gathered the current status of the chapter should be analyzed according to the criteria of review. Key issues arising, if any, need to be properly identified, and the document of review must be supported by all available and relevant evidence if necessary. Examples of evidence include chat logs, recordings, Emails, reports, etc.

Step 3 - Take action
With the review completed, the next step is to take action accordingly, depending upon the conclusion of the review. Such action may take the following forms
● simply informing the chapter coordinator that everything is in order, and taking note of the review
● providing notes and advice for necessary improvements to the respective chapter coordinator
● administrative intervention by the upper-tier coordination or the chapters administration

1. Types of coordinator & associated responsibilities
1.1 - International coordinator
1.2 - Chapter coordinator
1.3 - General team coordinator
1.4 - Project manager

2. Coordination requirements
3. Absence of a coordinator
4. Removal of a coordinator
5. Presence in meetings
6. Mailing list utilization
7. Responsibility and delegation


#1 Types of coordinator & associated responsibilities
Briefly, in the Zeitgeist Movement, the role of a coordinator can be summarized as the responsibility to maintain an active information flow in the movement without provoking conflicts as well an active concern in the accurate representation of the movement.

Although coordinator is referred to in the singular in this protocol, it is important to note that for a given chapter or project team there may be multiple coordinators among whom there is a specific representative/spokesperson.

Personal coordinators opinions don't represent the chapters or teams stance necessarily. Coordinators are just activists who accept a role after being selected via rational consensus of the active members.

A coordinator is not a leader but a communication node. When communicating a decision is a decision of all active members of the current chapter, team or project.

When a coordinator don't do his/her work, the organization will ensure that the all the work is done.


1.1 - International coordinator responsibilities
a) To organize and manage information between chapters (includes reports and meetings).
b) To be informed and to inform other chapter tiers and members of Movement activity.
c) To support and provide counseling to international project managers and chapter coordinators.
d) To review and validate national chapters, coordinators and international project proposals.
d) To participate in the review or approval national chapters, coordinators and international project
propos

High Level, High Quality Server, for the Community

The first order of business is the coordination for the creation and establishment of a more secure, common base, by way of a high level, and very secure common server, wherein to establish a home for the RBE community. Members of the RBE community who have expressed an interest, have been sent an invitation to participate in the selection of the common local.

Participants

1. The community will be populated by those choosing to join the common home. It consist of teams, chapter, or groups who,

a) are ready to set up their own system and carry out their activities;

Others are in development mode; and

others may provide sub-hosting services to those lacking such resources.

All are desirous of interacting with each other to share resources, address common problems, and arrive at solutions.

2. It will also be the home for the Global Developers Team who will coordinate the smooth transition and provide assistance to participants. The Global Developers Team will be the main account holder. It will provide provide private accounts to various team, if they wish a private account, or it will assist them in the participation of other products/platforms, such as the Zeitgeist Global Connect.

Long Term Developers Team Strategy

Keeping in mind that setting up the server is remains priority, as a safe place to work from, simultaneous activities will also be carried out touching on Global Developers organization, coordination, operational principles, standards for development activities, and further defining, clarifying, and refining community needs, and methods providing them.

One of the most important objectives is to answer, and resolve the following question: "How to bring the wide variety of talents, and personalities around us, into a cooperative, cohesive terribly effective group of people to work together, in a more advanced paradigm of human interactivity, for if we're to prevail in our endeavors we surely can't go forward without first transcending the old social paradigms. Succeeding in our primary concern should serve as a self measurement of initial effectiveness.

Instructions to the Process

If you are not already a member of this system, proceed with registration. Make sure to in addition to the user name, write the full name as you wish it to appear to others. Make sure also you join the Global Developers Team group. If you already have questions or comments, Feel free to open a Forum topic. We'll create further topics to deal with the matters at hand.

Sincerely, Ray Gman

It is my conclusion that the Colombian chapter meets the international TZM standard for communication, and is a valuable part of the global network. In this regard the Colombian chapter has successfully completed the review period, and there is no compelling reason for the chapter to be dissociated from the global network.

It is my conclusion that the Colombian chapter meets the international TZM standard for chapter/team/project activity, in accordance with protocol, as the chapter is very active with a range of events and meetings being held throughout the year. The chapter provides a variety of ways for volunteers to get involved, and has been successful in engaging large numbers of supporters. In this regard the Colombian chapter has successfully completed the review period, and there is no compelling reason for the chapter to be dissociated from the global network.

Drawing from the developments the Colombian chapter have made in all areas stipulated by the development plan, my conclusion and recommendation is that the Colombian chapter remain networked with the TZM global network, and continue its developments alongside all other global chapters.

It is the recommendation of this review that the GCA review and modify their processes and procedures in order to avoid unnecessary upheaval, and in order to maintain optimal fluidity of communications both between chapters and the GCA, and within the entire global network of chapters.

Andres et al,

I really don't want to get into any "he said-she said" arguments here that are based on things that have happened in the past. M y interest is in bringing the Colombian chapter into accordance with our protocols, and I have taken this on because I have no history of communication difficulties with the chapter, or indeed any other. I have a 1 month review period in which to do this (deadline 10th December), and I will do what I can within the reasonable expectations of a volunteer dealing with other volunteers. I would very much appreciate no further criticism levelled against the chapter during this period as it is important to provide unpressured breathing space for objective reflection and for improvements to be made with humility. It is not obligatory for anyone else to engage with the chapter as that is my responsibility during this period; therefore I expect any voluntary engagement with the chapter to occur with amicable intentions or not at all.

The following pertains specifically to the GCA:

Further to the point raised earlier regarding access to information such as protocols I would like to ensure that all chapters are advised of any changes that they, too, need to make in order to bring themselves into line with the protocols. I would like to negotiate a reasonable time-frame with the GCA in which this can occur - "reasonable" reflecting the time that will be needed for protocols to be translated into all applicable languages in order to ensure full understanding (I presume the protocols are already available in Spanish if the Colombian chapter is to be expected to adhere to them? Could I please have Spanish-language protocols to pass on to the chapter so that I can be satisfied they have them?). It is my understanding that the Linguistic Team is responsible for this, although I am unaware of any such translations having been made available so far - meaning that consistency in following protocol across all chapters is compromised at present.

So - GCA people - we will need to sketch out a development plan for chapters in general which takes into account smooth and consistent communication with the requisite documents available in all relevant languages. If the Linguistic Team are able to gather together a task-force to do this that would be optimal. If it is not to be the Linguistic Team then we will need to very carefully consider our "Plan B".

Cheers in advance of your contributions,
--
Kari McGregor
Editor, Spirit of the Times magazine
www.thespiritofcommunity.org

I see. Thanks Kari for the clarification, once again it's false. They made several meeting to review those protocols (the Colombian and the Spanish chapter) and they included all the links in there in every meeting and document. They knew where the info was and (at least in Latinamerica) everyone was informed about the google doc system and where to find the protocols. I don't know why they lied perhaps you could find out.

What really matters I concur with your approach, we need info made available instead of relying on the top down flow. I think we need a hub for every language and I think tzmchapters.net was meant to be that, so Miguel let us know if we can help.

Saludos,

Andrés Delgado

Actually, what the chapter said at the meeting I attended with them was that it is not clear where, if anywhere, the protocols are publicly available. It is true that until David put the protocls on the chapters portal today that they were unavailable there, and even we do not know where they are kept (I have copies myself because I took pdf copies back when I was working on editing the protocol docs last year).

This lack of availability, they feel, puts other chapters at risk of unintentionally breaching protocol (which is the case with many chapters, not just this one) as not everyone is up to date with what is expected or where to find the requisite information. This situation is easily exacerbated by changes in coordination where handover is not always optimal, or by new people joining not being told everything that happened in the past (remembering that we're all volunteers sometimes things slip through the net; I, for example, have been very diligent in informing the Australian chapter of these things but I can't vouch for all local coordinators passing the information on, or even reading it, and don't expect them to fill in every newbie on everything that's happened to date.

It was agreed that if information were more readily available then everyone would have equal access to it rather than relying on a top-down flow of information. This would make everyone's life less complicated and put the onus for being informed on all active volunteers, eliminating the possibility of information getting stuck in bottlenecks.

Thank you David for bringing this up, albeit slightly incorrectly :-)

Cheers,
--
Kari McGregor
Editor, Spirit of the Times magazine
www.thespiritofcommunity.org

That's bullshit (no offense intended) when the protocols were presented they said they don't accept them because they were made by a few people and they were 'imposed'. There is a mailing list from latinamerican where you can read this.

If the people in the chapter were not aware of them that is just another proof of how they were working, hiding the official messages from the people.

Saludos,

Andrés Delgado

Hi there peeps

I have been informed by Kari that Colombian chapter for the duration of the 1.5 year of chapter conflict resolution, was not even aware of existence of the chapter protocols. That was definitely one of the reasons why the conflict has grown to be such a heated issue.

Since chapters at present have no way to know that the protocols exist (and thus not know what they should comply to) - I decided to not just share the protocols with the Colombian chapter only, but to make the protocols available to the registered users on tzmchapters.net to avoid such miscommunication/misinformation in future.

For the review period 10/11/2012 - 10/12/2012 oversight and guidance of the Colombian chapter has been the responsibility of Kari McGregor, GCA representative for the Asia-Pacific region. Please see GCA meeting notes of 10/11/2012 for details. Please find also attached a pdf of these notes with the link to the recording.

Please see Colombia Chapter Review document (google-doc - view-only for all with the link) from the period 10/11/2012 - 10/12/2012 for details regarding the Colombian chapter's negotiated development plan. This document has been approved by the GCA as the official review criteria for the Colombian chapter during this period without controversy.

In the best interests of all concerned it has been requested that all non-necessary interactions between the Colombian chapter and those who have levelled complaints against the chapter be avoided for the period of this review.

1. Introduction

Regarding the development plan for the Colombian chapter I have asked for a high level of development - higher than is officially required of any chapter according to the protocols and chapters guide. It is my conclusion that the Colombian chapter has completed the basic requirements to a high standard, and most additional requests have been met to a satisfactory or high level.

Analysis will be presented here point by point, and it will be demonstrated how conclusions are drawn from this analysis.

2. Colombian Chapter Development Plan:

2.1 Website:
○ A new website has been established for www.zeitgeistcolombia.com, and looks professional and appealing to visitors.
○ A contact for the chapter has been clearly established. This contact is info@zeitgeistcolombia.com, and is clearly visible in multiple locations on the website.
○ A contact form is available on the website. This contact form is fielded by the communications team of the Colombian chapter.
○ There is a subscription function via the blog on the website for visitors to the site/supporters to subscribe to receive news and updates, as well as educational materials, from the chapter.
○ The website contains the following necessary features:
■ Up-to-date mission statement
■ Up-to-date structure guide
■ Up-to-date FAQ
○ Non-necessary (i.e. any that is not specifically educational material regarding the RBEM) TVP-specific content has been removed from website
○ The website footer content matches links.
○ The global website is clearly linked to on the landing pad of the website.
○ Website sections have been filtered to ensure that references to TVP are either removed from content, or it is made clear that TVP is not a focus of TZM (e.g. can refer to TVP/Jacque Fresco as the originator of the RBEM, but not that TZM are working with/for TVP in any way).
○ A few materials remain on the website that refer to TVP/Jacque Fresco. These are audiovisual and reading materials with an educational focus regarding the RBEM. There is no more TVP content on this website now than on most other TZM websites, and considerably less than some.
○ A blog section has been linked on the site that features dynamic volunteer-generated content relating to chapter activity and education/information.
○ A poll has been added that gathers data on how visitors to the site heard about TZM. This is a very useful function that I would recommend other chapters, including TZM Global, to replicate.

It is my conclusion that the Colombian chapter website meets the international TZM standard as expressed in the chapters guide and protocols, and is a good example of an appealing website that is easy to navigate and engage with. In this regard the Colombian chapter has successfully completed the review period, and there is no compelling reason for the chapter website to be dissociated from the global network.

2.2a Communications (Colombia internal):

○ The Colombian chapter have been regularly meeting on TeamSpeak and discussing their development plan.
■ I have been present at 3 Colombian chapter meetings in order to discuss the chapter development plan as presented to the chapter (and translated for them). I have fielded many questions in order to assist the chapter with their development and am confident that the chapter have understood the process of the review.
○ The communications team takes responsibility for the majority of inter-chapter communication, although the chapter provides both transparency with regard to
this, and opportunities for all interested volunteers to participate in the global network.
○ I have recommended, as I would for all chapters and teams, that the Colombian chapter participate in some facilitation training in order to hold effective meetings, workshops, and project/event planning sessions. The chapter, to my knowledge, has not yet had the opportunity to engage in such measures. In this way they are, to my knowledge, no different from any other chapter or team within the Movement, GCA and Global Core included (I have offered this opportunity to the GCA and Global Core as well, and the offer has not been taken up by these exemplary administrative bodies).

2.2b Communications (Latin America):

○ Erick and Oscar were requested by some of the GCA representatives to contact other Latin American chapters with clarification of their intention to proceed in cooperation non-violently, and to confirm a commitment to maintaining positive relations. Aside from this the Colombian chapter are not obligated to contact other Latin American chapters during the review period.
■ To my knowledge Oscar has not engaged in this way. It is not possible to hold any single volunteer accountable in this way as he is not an official representative of the Colombian chapter.
■ To my knowledge Erick has continued to communicate with the Latin American chapters, in a non-violent manner, although to my knowledge he has not specifically articulated this intention in writing. Again, it is not possible to hold any individual to account in this way.
■ It is my view that positive and non-violent interactions with the global TZM network in general are evidence of the intention to collaborate with the network. It is arguably not necessary for the Colombian chapter to interact specifically with the Latin American region, with the global network being the important network for communications in this global movement.
■ It is recommended that the Colombian chapter continue to maintain a place within the Global TZM network and collaborate with other chapters and project teams on order to advance the work of the Movement. This interaction should not be restricted to the Latin American region, nor specific to it.
● Communication with any network, whether global or regional (as per geographic proximity), takes place on the basis that it is supportive and developmental. Any communication not geared toward support or development of chapters is not a requirement that any chapter has to fulfil.

It is my conclusion that the Colombian chapter meets the international TZM standard for communication, and is a valuable part of the global network. In this regard the Colombian chapter has successfully completed the review period, and there is no compelling reason for the chapter to be dissociated from the global network.

2.3 Projects & Teams

○ Teams exist within the Colombian chapter for the purpose of communication as well as a variety of other activities.
○ TZM Colombia has volunteers/teams working well to execute successful events such as the Zeitgeist Media Festival.
○ The chapter continues to hold regular events and informational sessions such as screenings of the Zeitgeist documentary films, and their "Zeitgeist Cafe".
○ The chapter have agreed to remove the label "Zeitgeist" from all teams not obviously and directly connected with TZM aims and ethos as stated in the mission statement - i.e. if TZM does not take an official position on something we do not place the term "Zeitgeist" in front of it.
○ The volunteer-generated educational blog is available via the website, and appears to be regularly updated (the recommendation is to try to update the blog with at least one or two new articles/items per month).
○ The chapters/teams are regularly holding meetings on TeamSpeak, and are also holding regular events and education-focused sessions such as screenings of the Zeitgeist documentary films.

It is my conclusion that the Colombian chapter meets the international TZM standard for chapter/team/project activity, in accordance with protocol, as the chapter is very active with a range of events and meetings being held throughout the year. The chapter provides a variety of ways for volunteers to get involved, and has been successful in engaging large numbers of supporters. In this regard the Colombian chapter has successfully completed the review period, and there is no compelling reason for the chapter to be dissociated from the global network.

Drawing from the developments the Colombian chapter have made in all areas stipulated by the development plan, my conclusion and recommendation is that the Colombian chapter remain networked with the TZM global network, and continue its developments alongside all other global chapters.

I wish the Colombian chapter the best of luck with its future developments and hope to see some positive developments in conveying the message of the Movement to ever more people.

3. Further Information :

For further information regarding background to the case of the Colombian chapter and the 1 month review period please see the points below:

3.1 GCA history with Colombian chapter
To view the case of the Colombian chapter as reported via the GCA Trello board please click here. As is clear, there is not a great deal of information present in the time leading up to the GCA meeting of 10/11/2012, and no reports have been attached, no meetings requested, and no clear position taken.

3.2 Colombia Chapter Review from Latin American GCA representative
In early November 2012 I was passed a document by an anonymous volunteer with the Latin American chapters entitled "Colombia Chapter Review", dated July 2012, and written by Nelson Alvarez, Latin American Chapters coordinator. This report was never presented to the GCA, but forms the basis of the rationale presented to the Latin American chapters for the dissociation of the Colombian chapter from the global network. Please find a pdf of this report attached.

3.3 Vote against the Colombian chapter
I was present at the November 5th Latin American chapters meeting at which a "vote" was held to determine the future of the Colombian chapter within the TZM global network. I observed the harassment of the Colombian chapter and subsequent vote, in which 15 volunteers participated - 9 of them from the Argentinian chapter. The result of the vote was that the Latin American chapters voted to disconnect the Colombian chapter from the TZM global network. This vote went against the decision-making protocol, chapter protocol, and coordination protocol. Please find a pdf of the meeting notes attached.

3.4 Closure of a Zeitgeist Movement Chapter: Colombia - A Case Study
In response to these breaches of protocol I conducted a report entitled Closure of a Zeitgeist Movement Chapter: Colombia - A Case Study, detailing what had happened and analysing the case of the Colombian chapter in terms of accordance with the established protocols and in comparison with other chapters. Please find attached a pdf of this report. It is my recommendation that all chapter activities be brought into accordance with protocols.

3.5 Colombia Chapter Review by impartial GCA representative
On 10th November 2012 a meeting was held with the GCA (pdf of minutes attached - with link to recording) in which it was agreed that the Colombian chapter would be granted a 1 month review period which I, as an impartial representative (i.e. not involved in the Colombian chapter, any other Latin American chapters, or with any complaints against the chapter) of the GCA would oversee. The Colombia Chapter Review document was drafted, by me, in order to outline a development plan that addressed the issues raised in Nelson Alvarez's Colombia Chapter Review of July 2012. The criteria in this review document have been accepted/not objected to by the GCA and the Colombian chapter.

3.6 Harassment of GCA representative conducting review
Following my request that no non-essential communication take place between the Colombian chapter and any volunteers with a history of communication problems with the chapter I immediately (within 5 minutes of posting the link on the GCA Trello board - before even making the document available to the Colombian chapter) received a request from an external party (i.e. external from both the Colombian chapter and the GCA - therefore someone who could only have the link to the document if it were passed on by a representative of the GCA) with a history of communication problems with the Colombian chapter to share the Colombia Chapter Review document. Details (anonymised) of this interaction are pasted verbatim as follows:



On 12/11/2012 9:47 PM, [name removed for anonymity by Kari McGregor] (Google Drive) wrote:


Request to share
Document Colombia Chapter Review - Development Plan
Already own this item and [email removed by Kari McGregor for the sake of anonymity] asks you to share it with:
+ [Email removed by Kari McGregor for the sake of anonymity]
Add these people in Sharing settings.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My response was as follows:
Hi there,

With respect, as you have asked for me to share a private document, may I ask who you are? This document is intended for sharing with the GCA and Colombian chapter and has not yet been issued outside the GCA because it is not yet complete.
Thank you in advance of your clarification, Kari McGregor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further response from the individual responsible for the request was as follows:

During more than a year I have tried to dialogue with Colombian chapter activists, and all I have received are personal attacks and typical fallacies of trolls.

I was not alone in trying to solve the problem with Colombia, but also almost all the coordinators of Latin America.

Wherefore I access the document to keep not only information transparency also make the s support errands to develop a new structure of the Colombian chapter.
regards

[name removed for anonymity by Kari McGregor]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further response from myself

[name removed for anonymity by Kari McGregor],

In response to your request I will repeat what I have said to the GCA, and what I will relay at the next Latin American chapters meeting at which I will present an explanation from the GCA regarding the Colombian chapter review. Please note:

Please can those with a history of communication problems with the Colombian chapter refrain from all non-necessary contact with the chapter during the review period - it is necessary to provide the breathing space required for improvements to be made with humility.

This request was made when I provided the link to this document to the GCA. I have not publicized the link outside the GCA other than to provide it to the Colombian chapter as it is important that we be allowed to proceed with our work without interference. If you have been provided this document link by a GCA representative I would like to know what you were told about it and what your role is in relation to it. It is not obligatory for other Latin American chapters to have contact with the Colombian chapter during this period, and it is preferable for those who have a history of poor communication to avoid all unnecessary contact that may cause interference.

I would like to respectfully request that you contact me personally if you have any questions regarding the development of the Colombian chapter, and please refrain from making comments on the review document. Thank you in advance of your understanding and cooperation,
--
Kari McGregor
The Zeitgeist Movement, Global Chapters Administration for Asia-Pacific region
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to this request I was greeted with a tirade of personal criticism - directed at myself - written as commentary on the Colombia Development Plan google-document, precisely as I had requested not be done.

In addition, I have experienced criticism and ridicule from within the GCA and Global Core Team for taking on the task, as agreed by the GCA, of reviewing the Colombian chapter during this period. I find this behaviour to be a disgrace to the Movement, and entirely inappropriate. I hope to see more exemplary behaviour in future - behaviour befitting a movement that calls for a paradigm shift.

4. Conclusion & recommendations

It is the conclusion of this review that the GCA has acted contrary to protocol up until the point of the November-December 2012 review, with regard to the Colombian chapter.
This review has found satisfactory development of the Colombian chapter, aligning the chapter with all official protocols and guides. It is therefore the conclusion of this review that the Colombian chapter should remain an officially recognized chapter of the TZM global network.
It is the recommendation of this review that the GCA review and modify their processes and procedures in order to avoid unnecessary upheaval, and in order to maintain optimal fluidity of communications both between chapters and the GCA, and within the entire global network of chapters.

For the review period 10/11/2012 - 10/12/2012 oversight and guidance of the Colombian
chapter is the responsibility of Kari McGregor, GCA representative for the Asia-Pacific region.
Please see GCA meeting notes of 10/11/2012 for details.

In the best interests of all concerned it is requested that all non-necessary interactions
between the Colombian chapter and those who have levelled complaints against the chapter be
avoided for the period of this review.

It is requested that a volunteer from the Colombian chapter, or a trusted Spanish-language
friend of the chapter, please translate this document for the benefit of all active volunteers in the
chapter.

It is requested that this document be shared with all active volunteers within the Colombian
chapter immediately upon receipt. This document is for the use of the Colombian chapter only
and has only been shared with the Colombian chapter - who have been asked to share their
comments for negotiation, and GCA - who have been asked to limit their comments to the GCA
Trello board. This document is not for circulation outside the Colombian chapter or GCA until
after the review period is complete, at which point it will be attached to a publicly available report
document regarding the review of the Colombian chapter.

Please see below for the development plan for the Coloombian chapter. All points are subject to
reasonable negotiation (please use comments function) between Kari (GCA representative) and
the Colombian chapter volunteers.

(Recommended) Colombian Chapter Development Plan:

Please use comments function to signify "complete" once an action has been completed.

Week 1 (12th November - 19th November):

● Website:
○ Ensure that all sub-chapter & project coordination contacts are available (this can
be "contact@....." or "information@...." - it doesn't have to be just one person for
each chapter/team - emails can be received by groups if you choose
○ Put a contact form on the website (can be received by a number of people from
the communication team - negotiate within group how to handle emails)
○ Make sure the website has a clear subscribe function for visitors to subscribe to a
mailing list (google-group is not appropriate for newcomers)
○ Ensure website has an "About" section with the following in Spanish:
■ Up-to-date mission statement
■ Up-to-date structure guide
■ Up-to-date FAQ
■ (Update the Orientation Guide link when the new one comes out)
○ Remove TVP-specific content from website
○ Make sure footer content matches links (remove TVP link)

● Communications (Latin America):
○ Erick and Oscar are requested to contact other Latin American chapters (can
do this by email) with clarification of their intention to proceed in cooperation
non-violently, and to confirm a commitment to maintaining positive relations.
Aside from this the Colombian chapter are not obligated to contact other Latin
American chapters during the review period.

Week 2 (19th November - 26th November):

● Website:
○ Filter all sections to ensure that references to TVP are either removed from
content, or it is made clear that TVP is not a focus of TZM (e.g. can refer to TVP/
Jacque Fresco as the originator of the RBEM, but not that TZM are working with/
for TVP in any way).
○ Minimize the focus on TVP in videos and other educational materials; provide
more TZM-generated educational content (e.g. lectures from TZM lecture team if
available in Spanish)
● Projects & Teams
○ Establish education-focused team & set a development plan for educationoriented
activism (can be media production - e.g. blogging, Youtube clips,
lectures, etc)
○ Remove the label "Zeitgeist" from all teams not obviously and directly connected
with TZM aims and ethos as stated in the mission statement

Week 3 (26th November - 3rd December):

● Website:
○ Install Tabzilla links tab in order to provide automatically updated links to all
relevant chapters and projects in TZM
○ Set up a section for dynamic educational content - e.g. "what's new in TZM",
News, blog
● Communications (Colombia internal):
○ Send out a newsletter to mailing list informing chapter of the great new stuff on
the website & inviting people to get involved and volunteer for projects/chapters;
also include project updates & links to educational content if you can
○ Communications team: All members should do some facilitation training
(something I recommend for all chapters and coordinators) and apply learnt
skills to meeting procedures (Here is a link - in English I'm afraid - to a site for
professional facilitation. There are a lot of methods and tools here that will be
useful for anyone who ever needs to facilitate a meeting or consensus process.)
so everyone gets a clear voice and facilitator moves the process along, not
dominating

Week 4 (3rd December- 10th December):

● Projects & Teams
○ Establish volunteer-generated educational blog on site (try to update with at least
one or two new articles per month)
○ Ensure that chapters/teams holding meetings hold 1 education-focused session
per month (e.g. "Movies that Matter" screening, One Planet Project, or a lecture/
workshop session)

3.3 Vote against the Colombian chapter
I was present at the November 5th Latin American chapters meeting at which a "vote" was held to determine the future of the Colombian chapter within the TZM global network. I observed the harassment of the Colombian chapter and subsequent vote, in which 15 volunteers participated - 9 of them from the Argentinian chapter. The result of the vote was that the Latin American chapters voted to disconnect the Colombian chapter from the TZM global network. This vote went against the decision-making protocol, chapter protocol, and coordination protocol. Please find a pdf of the meeting notes attached.

3.4 Closure of a Zeitgeist Movement Chapter: Colombia - A Case Study
In response to these breaches of protocol I conducted a report entitled Closure of a Zeitgeist Movement Chapter: Colombia - A Case Study, detailing what had happened and analysing the case of the Colombian chapter in terms of accordance with the established protocols and in comparison with other chapters. Please find attached a pdf of this report. It is my recommendation that all chapter activities be brought into accordance with protocols.

These complaints are statements of actions that have taken place, but no evidence is presented at this stage. The phrase ¡§verbal violence¡¨ needs to be clearly defined in order for any complaint to be dealt with as such; and complaints that being referred to as ¡§a liar¡¨ constitute an ad-hominem attack are only valid if the attack was against the character of the individual and not their argument ¡V a case that can only be examined given the context of the comment. In order for any complaint to be properly investigated evidence must be provided to an impartial third party who is to conduct the investigation. It is the case here that the motion to close the Colombian chapter has been put forward by those responsible for making the aforementioned complaints ¡V all of which pertain to a single individual within the Colombian chapter, and not to the chapter itself.

If a chapter is to be dissolved on the basis of one or more complains made then it is agreed that those complaints must pertain to the functioning of that chapter, and not simply to the conduct of an individual volunteer toward any other. Complaints pertaining to the conduct of an individual volunteer may result in actions being taken with regard to that volunteer, but not the punishment of their entire chapter. It is also arguably the case that the informal complaints recorded in this case, despite being potentially offensive to some volunteers, are not sufficiently serious as to warrant the threatened closure of a chapter.

It is an invalid criticism levelled against an entire chapter to hold that the chapter should be dissolved due to the views of a single volunteer that any given project is unappealing to them, or that the Movement is inadequately following through on its ethos of horizontality. Complaints of this nature are not featured in the chapter protocol as sufficient reason to dissolve a chapter, and any attempt to dissolve a chapter on the basis of such complaints is a clear breach of protocol.

The use of a single Facebook post from a single individual to make a formal complaint against a chapter with the intent to dissolve that chapter is an absurd level of pettiness to stoop to. It is hoped that no such flimsy attempts are to be made in future as they absolutely fail to stand up to examination and are not worth the time spent investigating them.

Using these last words the chapter does not exist anymore as an official chapter and we need to wait for some volunteer who is willing to use the regular process... until then I suggest to use the third party chapter concept if it¡¦s possible to keep them near. There¡¦s nothing else to do with them, they can do what ever they want and like I said to Erik months ago in a 3 hours Skype conversation, they can be an example in the future of best organization, until now every time a chapter starts up, it¡¦s necessary to have a person or group of persons as voices to contact.

In this case I see fit to complain that a gross misconduct has been carried out in the case of the Colombian chapter whereby a decision has been made in direct conflict with the chapter protocol, the coordination protocol, and the decision-making protocol, and that it has led to a negative impact on the wellbeing of volunteers working for a well-established and highly functional chapter. As per the complaints protocol this report serves as a formal complaint submission to the GCA, against those responsible for the gross misconduct, to be investigated and rectified as per the appropriate protocols.

In closing, I find that in the case of the Colombian chapter there is no compelling reason for the chapter to be closed. There are matters pertaining to the chapter website that can be improved, given time, but it is necessary to concede that these are matters that pertain to many other chapter websites, and that there is no convincing reason to single out the Colombian chapter for dissolution. In the case of the Colombian chapter it is clear that the GCA has not followed protocol, and has mounted a case for closure against a chapter that we should instead be assisting with development.

Members as Erick and Oskar state: Everyone is a coordinator in Colombia, we don¡¦t have leaders and we don¡¦t want them either.

It is unusual for a chapter to not have coordinators. However, this does not mean that it is unacceptable. The coordination protocol clearly stipulates that it is necessary to have a clear point of contact established in every chapter. If there is a clear point of contact in a chapter for GCA representatives and visitors to the website then this is deemed sufficient for the sake of effective and efficient communication. This point of contact does not have to remain the same indefinitely, nor be restricted to a single individual. If the responsibility for fielding such communication is passed from one individual to another, or is the shared responsibility of a group of volunteers, then this is acceptable as a means of achieving the aim.

In this emergent movement which describes itself as horizontal and holographic it is to be expected that chapters will experiment with a variety of governance structures, with the aim of achieving the most horizontal and holographic structure possible for their individual stage of development. The imposition of a rule stipulating that there must be a hierarchical structure with one named coordinator is a notion born of an out-dated social structure favouring hierarchy ¡V one that the Movement claims to be moving away from.

Meeting notes of the Latin American chapters of the Zeitgeist Movement at which a vote was held regarding the dissolution of the Colombian chapter.

moderator
Javier Rodriguez (Argentina)
Guideline:
1. - Introduction
Two. - Last request to the chapter of Colombia
Three. - Other

Assistants

Argentina - CABA - Javier Rodriguez
Victor-Toronto
Claudio - Mar del Plata - Argentina
Venezuela - Oscar M. olive
Jorge Canada
Paul - Uruguay
Zentinela - Uruguay
Argentina - CABA - Argentina
Argentina - CABA - Basko
Argentina - CABA - Caro
Argentina - Chaco - Pilzenk
Argentina - Córdoba - Ezequiel
Argentina - Córdoba - Toto
Giancarlo - Guatemala
Ecuador - David
CABA matiasvan ARG
Javier (Costa Rica)
Argentina - CABA - Dani
Neo (C.A.B.A., Argentina)
Argentina - Córdoba - Fer
Argentina - Mar del Plata - Ornela
Argentina - CABA.Argentina - Alejandro
Colombia - Javier Vasquez.
Colombia. David Rivera
Ecuador - Danielus
recording
Are you agree that desoficialice chapter of Colombia?
Put your name and your YES or NO:

Victor-Toronto (GCA) SI
Argentina - Mar del Plata - Ornela If
Argentina - Mar del Plata - Claudio If
Argentina - Córdoba - Ezequiel If
Argentina - CABA - Javier Rodriguez - Yes
Argentina - CABA - Caro SI
Argentina - Cordoba - Toto SI
George - Canada (GCA) If
Ecuador-GYE Danielus NO
Argentina - CABA - Dani SI
Argentina - Chaco - Pilzenk If
Argentina - CABA - Alejandro Rozas - SI
Colombia - Javier Vasquez - SI
Ecuador - David - No (no more alternatives were sought in any of the 2 parts)
Javier (Costa Rica) If (due to the impossibility of the parties, I find, for now,
otherwise)

Introduction

This document aims to deal with the potential closure of a chapter by fully addressing all complaints listed, ensuring consistency in the treatment of all chapters, and ensuring consistency with protocol. The case study referred to is of the Colombian chapter, a chapter that has recently been slated for closure by some, but by no means all, members of the Global Chapters Administration.

Problems listed with the Colombian chapter, the case in point, are detailed in the document: Colombia Chapter Review, by Nelson Alvarez, dated Monday 5th November 2012, as pertaining to the following:

1. Chapter Website
2. Chapter Coordination
3. Visible Chapter Activity
4. Issues with Chapter members
5. Criticism from chapter members


These issues will be addressed in this document in a systematic process, and conclusions will be drawn at the end of each section that are in accordance with the protocols and procedures established by the Global Chapters Administration (hereafter referred to as GCA) in 2011.

Please note that it is not the aim of this document to call for the closure of any other chapter. Any comparisons present are made with the intention of highlighting inconsistencies in treatment or application of protocol. In the unfortunate case of any information being incorrectly represented in this document please do not hesitate to contact me with an amendment. A great deal of research has been conducted in order to produce this document, and any errors are due to my unassisted attempts to collate a great deal of information ¡V information that is unavailable from GCA resources ¡V in a very restricted time-frame.

1. Chapter Website

According to the Colombia Chapter Review, the following problems have been encountered on the Colombia chapter website.

a) There are no links to:
• The Global Site
• Mission statement
• TZM Structure
• FAQ
• Basic information on how/what to do to create a chapter
• A contact form or a visible contact email available on the site.
At present there is no GCA protocol in existence that outlines how websites should be constructed. However, there is a procedure followed by the GCA in assisting chapters with their establishment and development that is consistent across all chapters. For the sake of consistency across the Movement it is agreed that all chapter websites should contain:

• A link to the global site
• An ¡§About¡¨ section featuring
o The most up-to-date version of the TZM mission statement
o The most up-to-date version of the TZM structure
o The most up-to-date version of the TZM FAQ

For the sake of facilitating engagement with a chapter for any newcomer to the Movement it is agreed that all chapters should make the following easily visible and accessible via their website:
• A contact form or email contact
• Basic information regarding how to become involved; this may include:
o How to join a chapter, and
o How to establish a chapter, or
o How to engage with projects/teams

The following sub-sections detail how the issues reported on in the Colombia Chapter Review with the Colombian website are far from exclusive to Colombia, being issues that appear in many official chapter websites.

Missing links to the Global Site

Regarding links to the global site ¡V this is something that can be easily rectified, yet is also lacking in a number of other chapters. Other chapters without links to the global site include:
• Europe
o UK
o Switzerland
o Sweden
o Spain
o Russia
o Poland
o Norway
o Ireland
o Denmark
o Czech Republic (also links to Zeitgeist: The Movie)
• Africa
o South Africa
• North America
o Canada (old link so not working)
• Latin America
o Venezuela
o Peru
o Guatemala
o Ecuador
o Chile
o Argentina
o Costa Rica
o Uruguay (incorrect link + many incorrect/out of date links)
• Asia-Pacific
o Singapore
o India

The global site also has a link to TZM Paraguay, which appears to no longer be active. The domain has apparently been sold to a commercial organization which displays links to various commercial sites.

Missing Mission Statement

Regarding the Mission Statement there are a number of other chapters that either do not include any sort of mission statement, or do not include an up-to-date official version. These chapters include:

• Europe:
o Belgium
o Bulgaria
o Poland
o Finland
o Switzerland
o Macedonia
o Serbia
o Slovakia
• Africa
o South Africa
• Latin America
o Peru

Missing Structure Guide

Regarding the Official Structure there are a number of other chapters that do not include any sort of structure guide, and certainly not the official guide. These chapters include:

• Europe:
o Belgium
o Bulgaria
o Denmark
o Finland
o Germany
o Macedonia
o Switzerland
o Slovakia
o Serbia
• Africa:
o South Africa
• Latin America:
o Peru

Missing FAQ/inappropriate FAQ

Regarding the FAQ there are many chapters that either do not have an FAQ at all, or which use an FAQ that is specific to The Venus Project (as answered by Jacque Fresco), and not one that is specific to the Zeitgeist Movement. These chapters are as follows:

• Europe:
o Switzerland
o Croatia
o Slovakia
o Poland (incomplete)
o Czech Republic (coming soon)
o Germany ¡V only 1 Q in German
o Slovenia ¡V only in English
o Portugal ¡V loaded with TVP content
o Serbia ¡V exclusively TVP
o Belgium ¡V exclusively TVP
o Bulgaria ¡V exclusively TVP
o Lithuania ¡V exclusively TVP
o Macedonia ¡V exclusively TVP
o Denmark ¡V exclusively TVP
o Russia ¡V exclusively TVP
o Greece ¡V exclusively TVP
• Africa:
o South Africa
• Latin America:
o Peru
o Uruguay

Missing information on how to start a chapter

Regarding the chapter section, there are many other chapters that fail to include a section on how to start a chapter. Many sites do not have any section for sub-chapters at all. However, many of these chapters have links to groups/teams/projects (arguably these are acceptable as a substitute for chapters in the case of national chapters that have agreed, by consensus, to concentrate on a variety of projects rather than local PR-oriented chapters) ¡V many of which are active, although some chapters appear to be completely stagnant. Chapter sites without clear information on how to start a chapter are as follows:

• Europe
o Belgium
o Slovenia
o Slovakia
o Bulgaria
o Czech Republic
o Denmark
o Poland
o Germany
o Finland
o Switzerland
o Lithuania
o Serbia
o Italy
o UK
o Macedonia
• Africa
o South Africa
• Latin America
o Mexico
o Peru
o Ecuador
• Asia-Pacific
o Israel
o New Zealand
o Malaysia

It is agreed that all chapters are to be formally and individually advised of any necessary changes that are to be made to their websites by the GCA representative responsible for their region, and for a reasonable waiting period to be applied for the task to be complete. It is necessary to observe universal application of any requests and compliance, and for this to be supported by a protocol that is made available to all chapters.

b) Logo doesn't show the word ¡¥Colombia¡¦ on it.

This is the case for most chapters as most chapters are using the TZM official logo. It is, therefore, not adequate as a reason to call for the closure of any chapter unless it is clearly stipulated that all chapters must include a logo on their website with their country¡¦s name on it. If all chapters are to make this change then a notification must be officially delivered, and a reasonable waiting period must apply.

c) Presentation:
• The Zeitgeist Movement exists fundamentally as the TVP¡¦s activist arm
• TVP Materials and Experimental City

d) Venus Project

Points c and d will be tackled together as they are essentially the same point: i.e. heavy or inappropriate focus on the Venus Project. In this case there are several chapters that overtly focus heavily on the Venus Project or do so in an inappropriate manner. Most sites link to TVP in some way or have some TVP content. However, I mention here mainly the chapter sites whose content is potentially misleading. These chapters include:

• Europe:
o Belgium - Main page appeals too much to TVP/Jacque Fresco as a source of information/learning where there is alternative TZM content available but not used
o Bulgaria - Main page appeals too much to TVP/Jacque Fresco as a source of information/learning; under ¡§join the Movement¡¨ is a section that says ¡§support Project Venus¡¨ ¡V there is nothing about joining TZM
o Croatia ¡V The ¡§About Us¡¨ section has a sub-section called ¡§change¡¨ that is exclusively about TVP where there is alternative TZM content available but not used
o Lithuania ¡V A whole section from the main menu is dedicated to TVP
o Slovakia ¡V Heavy TVP focus throughout where there is alternative TZM content available but not used
• North America
o Canada ¡V A minor point, perhaps, but the mission statement lists the goal as ¡§to spread the message of TVP¡¨
• Latin America
o Peru ¡V Site has a ¡§donation¡¨ section in the main menu leading to the purchase of a TVP t-shirt; no other merchandise is listed

Regarding presentation in a more general sense the Norwegian chapter site appears to be a wiki, and not a conventional website. For this reason it appears that many of the features expected of a website are not present or are difficult to identify. A wiki seems like a very positive addition to any TZM chapter website, but standing alone as the face of any given chapter it is arguably not appropriate as a site for newcomers to the Movement to become involved.

It is agreed that the main focus of a TZM chapter website should be TZM, without the reliance on material of any other organization ¡V TVP included ¡V where there is material available via TZM that is adequate in providing an explanation. With ample material available it is expected that, if given an adequate time period in which to apply changes, any chapter requested to update the educational content of their website should be able to do so. Any chapter that is resistant to the use of TZM rather than TVP materials for educational purposes needs to critically examine their reason for such resistance.

e) Team Focus
• Zeitgeist Agriculture
• Zeitgeist Nutrition
• Zeitgeist Medicine
• Zeitgeist Architecture

It is clear that only a selection of the project groups within the Colombian chapter are listed here. This is in no way an accurate representation of the chapter¡¦s focus, but is, instead, a selection of four from a much larger number of active project groups in the chapter. These groups are not listed at the forefront of the chapter¡¦s activity, but are accessible via a transparent and horizontally structured Open Atrium platform. Many other chapters have links on their main site to project teams and groups ¡V many of which are of a similar type. It is clear that TZM Colombia are fulfilling their main objectives as a chapter, and are also engaging in a variety of other projects that make the chapter more holistic in focus.

With regard to a focus that is not strictly in line with the aims and ethos of TZM there are other chapters whose websites contain information that could be considered not entirely in line with, but not contrary to the Movement (e.g. no chapter condones violence or solicits open donations). As an example, the Czech Republic chapter has a section for articles, with sub-sections devoted to cooking, health and lifestyle. These are not simply on a Facebook page or Open Atrium site, but are clearly displayed on the main page.

It is agreed that a more holistic focus within any given chapter may reflect the micro-culture within that region or chapter, and is to be considered a natural facet of an emergent movement. Unless any chapter promotes values or projects that are either directly contrary to the aims and ethos of the Movement or are a clear attempt at hijacking the agenda, then the chapter is not to be criticized or harassed for their inclusion of a broad demographic of interests.

2. Chapter Coordination

According to the Colombia Chapter Review, the following problems have been encountered with regard to the Colombia chapter coordination.

• Nobody assumed the coordination once Gabriel Vivas (former National Coordinator) left the country to France
„h Members as Erick and Oskar state: Everyone is a coordinator in Colombia, we don¡¦t have leaders and we don¡¦t want them either.

It is unusual for a chapter to not have coordinators. However, this does not mean that it is unacceptable. The coordination protocol clearly stipulates that it is necessary to have a clear point of contact established in every chapter. If there is a clear point of contact in a chapter for GCA representatives and visitors to the website then this is deemed sufficient for the sake of effective and efficient communication. This point of contact does not have to remain the same indefinitely, nor be restricted to a single individual. If the responsibility for fielding such communication is passed from one individual to another, or is the shared responsibility of a group of volunteers, then this is acceptable as a means of achieving the aim.

In this emergent movement which describes itself as horizontal and holographic it is to be expected that chapters will experiment with a variety of governance structures, with the aim of achieving the most horizontal and holographic structure possible for their individual stage of development. The imposition of a rule stipulating that there must be a hierarchical structure with one named coordinator is a notion born of an out-dated social structure favouring hierarchy ¡V one that the Movement claims to be moving away from.

3. Visible Chapter Activity

According to the Colombia Chapter Review, the following problems have been encountered with regard to Colombian chapter activity.

• There is no report from the chapter since 2011
• There are no activities found in media, they use very well their ¡¥zeitgeist cafe¡¦ to talk and/or organize activities in facebook or Open Atrium such as this ¡§Experimental Farm¡¨ http://www.zeitgeistcolombia.com/equipos/agricultura/node/645

Although there is a formal chapter report protocol it is true that many chapters do not provide the monthly reports that they are required to do. With the majority of chapters failing to comply with this requirement it is clear that another method of communication between chapters is needed if the arbitrary dissolution of the majority of chapters due to non-compliance is to be avoided.

Many chapters provide reports of their activity at international chapter meetings, although there is often a long waiting period between meetings and insufficient time at meetings for each chapter to be properly represented ¡V in addition to the fact that many chapters are unable to be represented at such meetings due to time-zone issues.

It is arguably the case that formal reporting is not a necessity for any chapter. It is arguably the case that the role of the GCA is to assist chapters in their development and aid them in dealing with any issues they face. With this being the role of the GCA it is arguably sensible for the GCA to consult with the chapters they are responsible for assisting in ways that suit the functionality and development level of the group. Access to a transparent Open Atrium platform ¡V as is already the case with the Colombian chapter ¡V or a Trello board, or even a google-group, is arguably ample as a substitute for formal reporting as all information is clearly available without the need for duplication and bureaucratic form-filling.

4. Issues with Chapter members

According to the Colombia Chapter Review, the following problems have been encountered with regard to particular volunteers of the Colombian chapter. All complaints have been reported, recorded, and investigated by the people to whom they pertain, and not by any impartial third party. In the case of complaints it is best practice for mediation and investigation to be made by an impartial third party, and not the individual who has made the complaint. The complaints protocol stipulates that complaints regarding a chapter or national coordinator are to be investigated and dealt with by the GCA. In the case of the Colombian chapter I, as a Spanish-speaking GCA representative, offered on multiple occasions to mediate between the Colombian chapter and the complainants as the GCA representative closest to the chapter is one of the complainants, thus leading to a conflict of interests regarding solution of the case. However, my offers have never been taken seriously, with proposed invitations to mediate at meetings never upheld and the intentional blocking of my attempts at mediation at the most recent meeting of Monday 5th November 2012.

Complaints made against the Colombian chapter are as follows:
• Formal Complaints received with documents and recordings in GCA.
o Andres Delgado to chapters@thezeitgeistmovement.com March 04 2012 (verbal violence from Erick)
o Jorge Forero GCA Issue form March 14 2012 (verbal violence from Erick)
• Informal Complaints.
o Nelson Alvarez ad hominen attack October 1, 2011 received by Erick in a TS3 2 hours or more of conversation shared with more than 20 members hearing ¡§Nelson you are a Liar¡¨, Colombia has deleted the recording but there are witness members aware of that recording like Gabriel Vivas, who heard the full informal meeting next day October 2.(there is an email of that)
o Indirect disrespect to all Latin coordinators and members from Erick saying ¡§let¡¦s all go tomorrow to the latinamerican meeting, there are only stubborn people there (Erick recorded)

These complaints are statements of actions that have taken place, but no evidence is presented at this stage. The phrase ¡§verbal violence¡¨ needs to be clearly defined in order for any complaint to be dealt with as such; and complaints that being referred to as ¡§a liar¡¨ constitute an ad-hominem attack are only valid if the attack was against the character of the individual and not their argument ¡V a case that can only be examined given the context of the comment. In order for any complaint to be properly investigated evidence must be provided to an impartial third party who is to conduct the investigation. It is the case here that the motion to close the Colombian chapter has been put forward by those responsible for making the aforementioned complaints ¡V all of which pertain to a single individual within the Colombian chapter, and not to the chapter itself.

If a chapter is to be dissolved on the basis of one or more complains made then it is agreed that those complaints must pertain to the functioning of that chapter, and not simply to the conduct of an individual volunteer toward any other. Complaints pertaining to the conduct of an individual volunteer may result in actions being taken with regard to that volunteer, but not the punishment of their entire chapter. It is also arguably the case that the informal complaints recorded in this case, despite being potentially offensive to some volunteers, are not sufficiently serious as to warrant the threatened closure of a chapter.

5. Criticism from chapter members

According to the Colombia Chapter Review, the following problems have been encountered with regard to criticism emerging from volunteers in the Colombian chapter. What is referred to here as criticism is a series of comments made by individual volunteers with the Colombian chapter, and are not necessarily taken to be the consensus of the chapter:

• ¡§We have entered the second stage of projects, even when the global movement hasn¡¦t¡¨ (Erick recorded)
• ¡§The Protocols were an imposition from a few on the top¡¨ (Erick recorded)
• ¡§The movement is horizontal and the global moderators don't act as such¡¨ (Erick recorded)
• ¡§The Chapter Guide is just a Guide, you don¡¦t need to follow it¡¨ (Erick email to all hispanic speak googlegroup)
• ¡§The One Planet Project is just to collect emails and promote Peter¡¦s films and not our films¡¨ (Erick Recorded)
• A conspirative perspective showing repeative complaints against the US Government, UN and Corporations.
• Complaints of why the global movement doesn¡¦t react against them are constantly heard in Colombian meeting recordings, or for example this facebook post on July 01-2012:
¡§I agree that technology should be used to our advantage, but according to the current model of government investments, will the largest sums be invested in technology for better living? Is the Global ZM winning their fight in the prioritization of technology towards the construction of an EBR? Should not TZM Global, with 500 thousand members and its mented CRITICAL MASS, be questioning the WWF or other UN to avoide this kind of things instead of being in an eternal fight regarding organizational issues? What technology is being used for today?¡¨ (Oskar in several latino facebook about new usa technology weapons, picture saved)

It is arguably the case that such perspectives are not restricted only to volunteers with the Colombian chapter, of whom only two are mentioned in this complaint. Such complaints based on comments made by individual volunteers represent an attempt to criminalize certain actions or viewpoints within the Movement rather than openly accepting the variety of views that we may all hold. It is an invalid criticism levelled against an entire chapter to hold that the chapter should be dissolved due to the views of a single volunteer that any given project is unappealing to them, or that the Movement is inadequately following through on its ethos of horizontality. Complaints of this nature are not featured in the chapter protocol as sufficient reason to dissolve a chapter, and any attempt to dissolve a chapter on the basis of such complaints is a clear breach of protocol.

The use of a single Facebook post from a single individual to make a formal complaint against a chapter with the intent to dissolve that chapter is an absurd level of pettiness to stoop to. It is hoped that no such flimsy attempts are to be made in future as they absolutely fail to stand up to examination and are not worth the time spent investigating them.

Conclusion

To conclude this report it is pertinent to refer to the ¡§ending notes¡¨ of Nelson Alvarez, author of the Colombia Chapter Review document:

Ending Notes

After the last coordinator Gabriel left Colombia, he was under pressure by other chapter members, but at that time (a year ago) he asked Gilbert and I to not interfere with that issue. I consider that was a mistake from Gilbert and I, there was excellent communication with the chapter before that, and right after Gabriel left everything became confusing because nobody oriented the movement and then a lot of different opinions, projects and horizontality interpretations started to show up.

So even that the chapter is very active, most of the activities are oriented not in spreading the information but including people by using different -non TZM related- kinds of projects.

Using these last words the chapter does not exist anymore as an official chapter and we need to wait for some volunteer who is willing to use the regular process... until then I suggest to use the third party chapter concept if it¡¦s possible to keep them near. There¡¦s nothing else to do with them, they can do what ever they want and like I said to Erik months ago in a 3 hours Skype conversation, they can be an example in the future of best organization, until now every time a chapter starts up, it¡¦s necessary to have a person or group of persons as voices to contact.

So I repeat, the chapter of Colombia is big enough to be cut off by an official mechanism. They shouldn¡¦t be compared with a ¡§cancer¡¨, it is more like a ¡§flu¡¨ at least in this part of the world because the rest of the chapters are getting prepared for this.

The former coordination did great things in the country and nearly 4000 can be contacted by our main mailing list at thezeitgeistmovement.com, therefore I recommend to take that channel as our communication tool in order to gain a new momentum and recover the focus in the Colombian chapter so it can regain its official status.

WE CAN'T LEAVE THIS PEOPLE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo7XGBArLe4

Nelson Alvarez

In stating ¡§the chapter does not exist anymore¡¨ this seems a little pre-emptive as there has been no consideration on the part of the GCA following this report. In fact, this report has not been presented to the GCA at all, but provided to me by an unnamed volunteer ¡V who I have never met ¡V who was present at the meeting at which a vote was held regarding the dissolution of the Colombian chapter. Documentary evidence of the vote held at this meeting is available by clicking here.

According to the chapter protocol a chapter can be dissolved either due to it no longer being active, or by the GCA (the assumption being the whole GCA is inferred in this document as it is not stipulated that it is up to any particular member of the GCA) acting in accordance with the chapter protocol which stipulates that there are two conditions under which a chapter may be terminated:

1. Cessation of activity within the chapter that is observable for an extended period of time
2. 2. Promotion of an agenda/direction that is contrary to the aims and ethos of the Movement

In the chapter protocol it is not stipulated that a chapter may be dissolved due to any of the reasons outlined in the Colombia Chapter Review document, nor that a chapter may be dissolved by a vote from volunteers outside that chapter who are neither directly affected by the chapter nor are GCA representatives. Voting is a decision-making method that is explicitly not endorsed by the Movement as per the decision-making protocol; and the inclusion of certain volunteers of chapters other than the Colombian chapter, and outside the GCA in this vote is a matter that remains this far unexplained by those responsible for the course of action taken. In fact, this vote and its implications are yet to be formally announced to the GCA, the body explicitly responsible for the decision in question.

In this case I see fit to complain that a gross misconduct has been carried out in the case of the Colombian chapter whereby a decision has been made in direct conflict with the chapter protocol, the coordination protocol, and the decision-making protocol, and that it has led to a negative impact on the wellbeing of volunteers working for a well-established and highly functional chapter. As per the complaints protocol this report serves as a formal complaint submission to the GCA, against those responsible for the gross misconduct, to be investigated and rectified as per the appropriate protocols.

The reference to the Colombian chapter as being ¡§like a flu¡¨ rather than a ¡§cancer¡¨ bears the connotation of the practices of the Colombian chapter being something to be feared for the possibility of contagion among other chapters. It remains to be considered why the chapter is referred to in this way, as a chapter in an emergent movement that has done nothing against protocol ¡V or nothing that many other chapters haven¡¦t done ¡V should be appreciated for its collective efforts, and not treated like a disease to be excised for fear of contamination of other chapters with its emergent values.

In closing, I find that in the case of the Colombian chapter there is no compelling reason for the chapter to be closed. There are matters pertaining to the chapter website that can be improved, given time, but it is necessary to concede that these are matters that pertain to many other chapter websites, and that there is no convincing reason to single out the Colombian chapter for dissolution. In the case of the Colombian chapter it is clear that the GCA has not followed protocol, and has mounted a case for closure against a chapter that we should instead be assisting with development. I hope that this case provides a positive learning experience for all concerned, and that we can all proceed with a greater degree of clarity and integrity regarding what is expected of a chapter, the GCA, and our experience of advancing a new paradigm for a sustainable Earth.

Kari wrote: Now - the reason I have gathered contact details is because I would like to stay in touch with the other chapters of the global network - even after Australia has been removed from it officially. The Australian team has expressed quite some concern regarding the fact that we now no longer have access to any platforms of communication in the Movement beyond TeamSpeak, and are obviously powerless to engage in global meetings via TeamSpeak without the written platforms of communication for the purpose of notification. With Australia-based volunteers having been removed from the ZM-chapters google-group we are now effectively isolated - unconnected to the M ovement, despite having complied with demands to do xyz with the consequence of non-compliance being this disconnection we are now experiencing. I have also been informed by several volunteers from other chapters that the content of the ZM-chapters google group is being censored - with items and threads being deleted without explanation. This is not an open and transparent platform of communication, and only serves to exclude and isolate us further, despite us being officially linked as a chapter in the M ovement's global network. I am sure you can see why we would wish to hang on to contacts with other chapters as it is only possible to be a real part of a movement if one is networked and able to communicate effectively.

Please understand that when I warn you that many are talking of leaving the M ovement I am simply the messenger - a lot of people are unhappy with the structure and function as is, and perceive that TZM is not functioning in the way that would seem natural in light of what we advocate.

Please take on board the conditions suggested by the Asia-Pacific team as stated on the GCA Trello board. I have now left the GCA Trello board, so please take this as the absolute end of my work with the GCA. I will write to PJ and ask that he remove my zeitgeistmovement.com email address - I prefer to do this personally as I have some final words for him that I would like to express.

Hi there Miguel,

(David and Mahima please bear with me - content most relevant to you is coming further down the email!)

You're quite right in observing that I copied some of the Trello cards from the GCA board. I have copied them to my own private Trello board, to which only I have access. You needn't worry that this might have been done with the purpose of sharing the information on them with others - I have no intention of doing this - and certainly did not need to copy them to do that as the board was publicly visible - at least until yesterday. My reason for copying them was just a short-cut to gathering some contact details of other chapters in the Movement. It was simply easier for me to copy the cards than it is for me to trawl through the chapter websites to get them. I should probably also point out that there was nothing covert about it as all Trello actions are recorded for all users of a board to see - so if I had wanted to do anything covert you wouldn't know about it!

Now - the reason I have gathered contact details is because I would like to stay in touch with the other chapters of the global network - even after Australia has been removed from it officially. The Australian team has expressed quite some concern regarding the fact that we now no longer have access to any platforms of communication in the Movement beyond TeamSpeak, and are obviously powerless to engage in global meetings via TeamSpeak without the written platforms of communication for the purpose of notification. With Australia-based volunteers having been removed from the ZM-chapters google-group we are now effectively isolated - unconnected to the M ovement, despite having complied with demands to do xyz with the consequence of non-compliance being this disconnection we are now experiencing. I have also been informed by several volunteers from other chapters that the content of the ZM-chapters google group is being censored - with items and threads being deleted without explanation. This is not an open and transparent platform of communication, and only serves to exclude and isolate us further, despite us being officially linked as a chapter in the M ovement's global network. I am sure you can see why we would wish to hang on to contacts with other chapters as it is only possible to be a real part of a movement if one is networked and able to communicate effectively.

I have not shared these contacts with anyone - although most of them are visible via chapter websites anyway, so there is no breach of privacy here - I just grabbed quick info rather than labouring with time I don't have to spare. This is not something I would have felt the need to do at all had we not been arbitrarily excluded from the global network despite our compliance with demands.

Thank you very much for the acknowledgement of my professionalism - I must applaud you for the same. You do a great job of always keeping your head above the water and getting on with the task in hand - something unusually balanced for a young guy, if I may say so without meaning to patronize. You are right that the created environment has been uncomfortable for me - it has been nothing short of hostile, and this, in my extensive experience of non-profit and social movement work is unprecedented. I view it as a pathological environment to work within and needs a radical overhaul if the M ovement is to survive. Please understand that when I warn you that many are talking of leaving the M ovement I am simply the messenger - a lot of people are unhappy with the structure and function as is, and perceive that TZM is not functioning in the way that would seem natural in light of what we advocate. I urge you to take these concerns seriously and work to address them. M y own attempts at addressing them have been unfruitful - perhaps due to a perceived threat I pose to positions people identify with more strongly than their professed values. I care nothing for people's ego-identities. I only care that we work to make the world the sustainable and equitable place it should be - a world worthy of our humanity - a task that requires us to maintain integrity of action at all times yet with the understanding that we are all only human, and imperfect as such.

Thank you very much for your offer to take on my remaining tasks in the GCA. I would very much appreciate if you would take over for the short period of time that it would take to orient M ahima to the work. There won't really be anything for you to do with the chapters as all the wheels are spinning as needed - you would only really need to take on the developing chapters yourself if there is a long time-lag between my departure and M ahima's start. I have cc'd M ahima into this email for the sake of your future direct correspondence with her, so you have her email and she is clear on what has been said in this email. Please take on board the conditions suggested by the Asia-Pacific team as stated on the GCA Trello board. I have now left the GCA Trello board, so please take this as the absolute end of my work with the GCA. I will write to PJ and ask that he remove my zeitgeistmovement.com email address - I prefer to do this personally as I have some final words for him that I would like to express.

Regarding the Colombia chapter review what happens from now is not my concern. I have completed my report on the basis of the review criteria. Any new information that has been provided since the review is the basis of a further review, and not part of this one. It is of no personal interest to me what happens with the chapter; it is simply my interest that protocol be adhered to at all times, and that all volunteers are treated fairly, with respect, and with the intention to continue working together in a positive manner. I hope that this is the spirit in which any and all future investigations and reviews will be carried out.

Thank you for your time M iguel - I appreciate it more than you know. I hope that we will be able to re-engage for our work as agents of change at some point in the future. You are a valuable human being and I hope that you feel the good that you
--
Kari McGregor
Editor, Spirit of the Times magazine
email: magazine@thespiritofcommunity.org
website: www.thespiritofcommunity.org

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY


Click to get back to topic starter

Kari wrote: Carlos is open with me about his past experiences with the CND, which he parted from when he came to understand that there was a "non-TZM socialist agenda involved" (his words). He admits to being regretful because he did not see it for what it was from the start and was involved because he believed there to be more common ground than there actually was with his own values.

Kari wrote: 4. Carlos expresses no personal problems with any individuals, stating that he sees positive intention in all
concerned regardless how things sometimes go in potentially confrontational situations. He has mentioned
issues with the communication style of Gilbert and Ray. I don't get involved with that, but I do understand
that we all need to be careful to communicate effectively and non-violently.

Kari wrote: 5. Carlos has problems with the LTI - I'm not sure this could be reasonably summarized as a campaign against
the LTI. I think he raises some valid concerns and that we need to work together to ensure optimal
functionality. It doesn't help us to be protective of the status quo (we, of all people, are surely aware of this
point) - especially as these issues are not of a personal nature - they pertain to administrative matters that
could function better if we are willing to discuss ways in which this can be achieved.

Topic: Email thread regarding TZM internal politics
Email thread regarding TZM internal politics - in relation to Nelson Alvarez's claims about Carlos Diaz.

Hey there,

I'd just to clarify a few things re: Carlos Diaz (aka Brujo) because I'm not comfortable with internal politics and am not keen to see any discussions regarding structure or functionality become personal in any way. I would also like to clarify that I do my own thinking, respond according to my values and integrity, and am not persuaded to see things through anyone else's prism.

1. Carlos was always in a position to be able to tell anyone he wanted to tell about the core team because he has known about it since formation, as have all TZM AU coordinators and core-team members. He has expressed no problem with the team or with any individuals involved in it. I think that it is positive that he allowed information to come from the team itself, and not circulate as hearsay. It was my un coerced decision to pass on this information and if anyone thinks there is a problem with that I'm happy to discuss it, as we did yesterday.

2. I know Carlos quite well - to the extent that I have spent personal time with him and his wife and even visited them in their home, and am in constant and positive communication with him. He is a valuable member of our team in Australia and hasn't caused a hint of a problem in any way (although he does sometimes call out members on their lack of comprehension of the M ovement - those interested in TZM nutrition type of ideas - he's certainly no advocate of anything that strays from the accepted TZM line).

3. Carlos is open with me about his past experiences with the CND, which he parted from when he came to understand that there was a "non-TZM socialist agenda involved" (his words). He admits to being regretful because he did not see it for what it was from the start and was involved because he believed there to be more common ground than there actually was with his own values.

4. Carlos expresses no personal problems with any individuals, stating that he sees positive intention in all concerned regardless how things sometimes go in potentially confrontational situations. He has mentioned issues with the communication style of Gilbert and Ray. I don't get involved with that, but I do understand that we all need to be careful to communicate effectively and non-violently.

5. Carlos has problems with the LTI - I'm not sure this could be reasonably summarized as a campaign against the LTI. I think he raises some valid concerns and that we need to work together to ensure optimal functionality. It doesn't help us to be protective of the status quo (we, of all people, are surely aware of this point) - especially as these issues are not of a personal nature - they pertain to administrative matters that could function better if we are willing to discuss ways in which this can be achieved.

Regarding my letter - it was a response which I felt was needed considering the email thread I responded to was full of misunderstandings that should be set straight. The letter was intended to clear up already existing misinterpretations - not to create any. I'm tired of internal politics - it has no place in a M ovement for social change and I've seen this crap before in other organizations in which the majority of people are just trying to do the right thing but need to be equipped with information such as who to approach regarding certain issues. There are tiers of coordination within the M ovement and it's only fair that people know who the go-to people are. I think that if people just know how things actually are then people like Gilbert won't be in the line of fire when there's no good reason for it. When things are made clear no one will have any ground on which to attack anyone and will be exposed for their actions if they do so. I'm not going to make any predictions for the future regarding how this information will be taken or used. All I can say is that with nothing to hide I feel no fear.

Please see yesterday's meeting agenda for the proposal in point #4 that clarifies my position further. I'm happy to discuss.

Cheers,
K McGregor

Sorry for my delay too, I just arrived home, but well, the topic in the meeting was around Karin's email to an open latin-america's group list exposing the core team through a third party (Carlos)"brujo". This led to misinterpretations about the creation of the TZM Core Team. Looks like a leak of "secret info", first because it's not a regular way, but mostly because Carlos (brujo) instigated in this matter.

I don't doubt Kari's kindness, but obviously, her knowledge about the spanish speaking chapters affairs is coming from Carlos, who was an instigator on Brian's CND case, Spains-Plaza del Sol Movement (precursor of OWS), open campaing against LTI Team and some "ad hominem" attacks to Gilbert, Miguel, Ray and me.

All this plus the misinterpretations from some colombians making noise for the last 10-12 months about infamously "horizontality", make continuos ad hominem attacks and strawman falacyes at people, and propagate the idea that the Colombian chapter "IS" doing well with "Zeitgeist Teams" like "Zeitgeist Nutricion", Zeitgeist Permaculture" and Zeitgeist Medicine" to mention a few.

Im trying to deal with all this, and answering James question, no man, nothing relevant on education, the recording is just in my computer, and if somebody only in this group needs it I will upload it in a few hours. I would like to thank Jason and the other participants, and I suggest all to keep working and not waste time on structural issues, for that I think we already have the asynchronous tools.

Take Care
Nelson

Sorry for my lack of attendence. I am not sure how much help I will be to this group to be honest as I said what I needed to at the last meeting.

Was there anything concerning TZM Education that I need to know about? Once again apologies. Speak soon,

James Phillips
TZM Educationwww.tzmeducation.org
Tel: 07733135186
www.thezeitgeistmovement.comwww.thevenusproject.com

Hey there guys,

Today's meeting was not conducted in full due to low attendance. Please see attached agenda pdf for comments. We concentrated mainly on agenda item #4, but agreed not to make any decisions without larger representation of the team. Nelson has the recording which, I think I'm correct in saying, we have agreed is to be available only to the core team unless it is explicitly agreed otherwise, due to the sensitive nature of the discussion topic (please correct me if I'm wrong.

So - I'll leave it open to others to suggest an opportunity for the next meeting and to follow up on anything from the agenda in the meantime.

Cheers & take care,
Kari McGregor
TZM AU National Co-Organizer
Skype : karinellenmac
Email : ka...@zeitgeistaustralia.org
Mobile : +61 419 462 877

"For the record, I will no longer be engaging or acknowledging the CND. I have tried my best to be patient and understanding. I'm completely unimpressed with the manner of conduct and assumpotions made in what has been expressed to me. While the basic intention is good, the near obsessiveness of the issue in context is counterproductive and detrimental.

The Zeitgeist Movement's basic structure will always warrant improvement, as with anything, and all coordinators and members work together to make that happen. However this does not warrant a secondary bureaucracy/institution. The real problem is that the current method of data flow hasn't really been utilized correctly and we will have meetings to make sure these protocols are clearly understood soon.

As stated in my prior response, The Zeitgeist Movement is about an external communication 99% of the time and the other 1% is about our volunteer coordinators and how they conduct themselves; chapter protocols.

Is it perfect? No. But it will undergo improvement and harping upon it or trying to superimpose some other ideology upon it will only lead to wasted time and further dispute.

If anyone out there can't handle the very minor authority given to volunteers who have nothing to gain personally/financially by trying to work with their local groups and bridge communication with other chapters - then this movement isn't for you. If anyone is more concerned with internal "power abuse" or such control than people trying to communcate this data to their community - then this movement isnt for you.

I trust the coordinators and the methods we have. When problems arise, they are dealt with on the Tier chapters of coordinator and resolved. It's all very simple and really secondary to our purpose/

Anyone still not understanding the basic flow of our internal organization can see:
www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/inde...d=100151&lang=en    (link removed)
"What is TZM Basic Structure and Processes?""

I'm not sure The Zeitgeist Movement is a cult, I've never really agreed with that particular label. But I do think it is an e-sect (or Internet-Sect) that promotes an isolating and unhealthy world view. When something almost entirely exists on the Internet, I think it is fair to criticize how moderation is done. On the surface, yes, it was just a forum. But in the context of the e-sect, the forum was a temple.

The idea that dissent was accepted is, from my long experience visiting their "temple", simply not true. I specifically remember one user who was cast out and shunned for no other reason than he opposed the inclusion of 911 conspiracy theories. The goal of TZM and all that was something he fullyembraced, but he opposed the inclusion of conspiracy theories. Peter Joseph Merola himself finally banned him because of his continued dissent on an issue the user thought made TZM look bad. There were also users banned and shunned due to personality conflicts with certain moderators and those close to moderators regardless of the users fully embracing the ideology and goals of TZM. This is not indicative of a group that welcomes or even tolerates dissent. It may sound silly, but if you really believed in something and were shunned by a group simply for having different ideas, even one that only really exists online, it probably isn't like being banned from some random forum you rarely visit.

The forums also contained an enemies list: a list of people's Facebook accounts that were off limits to members. The enemies list contained former members who became critical of TZM and people who had never been members that were critical of TZM. This list was presented as if the names and links on the list were people who were actively seeking out and harassing TZM members, but there were plenty of people on the list who never harassed anyone but were merely critics on some other forum or site. It was very similar to the sorts of lists Desteni keeps. This list was started by VTV himself and defended by him after questioned by members. The enemies list remained on the forums, and stickied, until they were closed.

I don't think TZM is necessarily a terrible thing, simply because it's fairly incompetent atgetting any real exposure or acceptance by anyone outside of TZM. But I also think it's an unhealthy organization because it saps the time, energy and money from well intentioned people and sucks them into a bizarre Internet utopian sect.

My initial interest in monitoring TZM came about due to the drastic differences in the groups philosophy vs. the way the organization was lead. I found it rather interesting that members of the organization wanted a form of direct democracy but decisions regarding the direction, messaging and imagery of the organization were entirely controlled from the top down. Sometimes even to the chagrin of those at the bottom doing the actual legwork to promote the organization. I found myself wondering how they could overlook such a glaring contradiction. The only explanation I could think of is that the members on the bottom of the pyramid had so much emotional investment in the goals of the organization that they were willing to overlook the glaring contradictions. I've always been interested in how people can rationalize their way through cognitive dissonance, and monitoring TZM's forums were a constant source of watching people do exactly that.

I will not attempt to assume the motives of those at the top of the pyramid. It is pointless to speculate as to whether they are con artists or true believers. The only thing one can look at is the results, and the results have so far been more and more central control as interest in the organization wanes.

Another thing I might mention is TZM becoming an activist arm of The Venus Project. TZM was initially sort of like AboveTopSecret and sites like that: a place for people to discuss conspiracies, alternative history, psueo-science and things of that nature. On a whim, Peter Joseph Merola decided that Jordan Maxwell was no longer his inspirational figure and hero, but Jacque Fresco was. Instantly and overnight TZM changed into existing for the sole purpose of advocating Jacque Frescos ideas. This is why the forums were a constant battle between those wanting to promote fringe ideas and those wanting to promote The Venus Project. This schism has never been resolved and I doubt it can ever be resolved due to Zeitgeist: The Movie being TZM's greatest recruitment tool, which Peter Joseph Merola has admitted to on more than one occasion. This was the reason why, despite constant requests from members to do so, he refused to distance TZM from the first film. He never did distance himself from that film, but instead doubled down on it by working with notorious pseudo-historian Acharya S (D.M. Murdock) to prop up the questionable material in Zeitgeist: The Movie with more questionable material from Acharya S.