Skeptic Project

God... Anyone interested in linking debunkings of their various arguments in this thread? I'm not sure where to find them all, I know we have a few of them here, though. If they're really going to air this retardedness on TV, we should at least have a solid article with all of the opposing information in one place.

What do these physicists have to gain from saying it fell at free fall, when it clearly didn't? Are they sincerely confused about how long it took, or is there an agenda?

IF there was in inside job, why blow it up anyway?

Two towers aren't devastation enough?

Couldn't the CIA just take the documents and destroy them, or just let them be destroyed in the fire? If I want to destroy some voided checks, I don't burn my house down or blow it up, that's just stupid and the same logic.

The 1273 "verified architectural and engineering professionals" at AE911Truth.

I would say that 1, they have people like Anders Bjorkman (aka Heiwa) on that list who believes in no planes and is, undoubtedly, a lunatic.
http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=4439450&postcount=1

Secondly you can always find fringe people with apparent education that believe in all kinds of nonsense. 1273 however is extraordinarily tiny when you consider that around 17,000 engineers are newly qualified every single year just in the US. Yet, Gage's figure includes architects and people from all over the world and has been collecting names for years.

If by quacks you mean idiots, then yes. You'll also notice only about 1 or 2% of that figure actually get involved with the whole thing. The rest are just names on a list.

haha nice, thanks for the link.