Skeptic Project

Such a troll, Matt.

Just wanted to throw in using TZM logic based on the debate, if they (they being VTV, and Peter) argue it's not been tested or data is no good because variable haven't happened yet, then I suppose things like air, gas and other things even computer are made up and or not based on logic as well as not based on science yet somehow it works... By their logic just because one has the ingredient and data showing how to make pancakes, and all the chemical components that happens with pancakes it doesn't mean it's going to make pancakes. The fact that they can't "get it" (they being VTV and Peter) is not because of a lack of science or scientific method on aegis but a lack of them not wanting to except that the money system is not all that bad and that maybe RBE will not be the "end all solution" they want it to be. This fact alone is why VTV and Peter have lost this debate with aegis as I refrain from calling it a intellectual debate since ZERO science was used from TZM/TVP to show how a RBE would worked based on the scientific method.

Aegis is probably not even trying to hard just showing them typical economics 101 stuff yet Peter and VTV lack of understanding shows the difference between a college intellect to a person with sudo intellectual skills. It's not VTV or Peter's fault for not understand it's the fact that they both have reached their intellectual peak long ago and I'm afraid aegis college intellectual level is beyond them 50 fold. Essentially Aegis talking to VTV and Peter is like talking with someone with the mentality of a pebble, just a analogy though.

With this kind of reasoning and presentation, no experts will ever be interested in TVP. No policy makers will take it seriously. No one who has any real knowledge of economics or sociology will even sit still to listen to Merola or Fresco rant.

Word.

There was a 30 second bulletin on TV once saying scientists had collaborated to create a blueprint for solving the worlds problems, this "Venus Project" would soon present its findings. It was funny, because...well, I don't think I have to explain it, but it was also sad, because if they did it that way, they might actually accomplish something.

Would've been nice to have some folks to work with, now all I'm getting is a delicious portion of word salad every day. Yummy.

The thread's been locked.

> It's possible to make a RBE in a virtual environment but definitely not with 2nd life

Agreed that 2nd life isn't suitable.

I wonder how many TZM members will play in my virtual environment when its finished.. (And whether they will manage to put together an RBE team to test their theories..)

Praise be to Peter for his undying strength in these hard times. In the name of VTV, Amen.

These guys do nothing but post youtube videos and ignore logic. I would of broken down and went apeshit if I was that Aegis guy.

I got through about 20 pages of that thread and came down with a huge headache. Was it all the black on white text? Or was it the sheer amount of rage-inducing stupidity? Only God knows

Shame I didn't even get to when VTV entered the picture. What's his handle on Colbert Nation?

Edit: Oh also, I remember I was listening to one of Peter's lectures that day too. I'm learning towards the second explanation I think...

"Shame I didn't even get to when VTV entered the picture. What's his handle on Colbert Nation?"

Liz

Just kidding, I have no idea.

What exactly is being reviewed? From that, who is doing the reviewing? How will the participants of the debate know when the process is concluded?

@Special Ed

LOL so true