Skeptic Project

Awesome entry.

Muertos, you are the best writer on this site.

Also I'd like to add in addition to Erich von Daeniken, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos is big into ancient astronauts, and often blatantly lies to support his "theories." I talk about one in particular in this post:

http://conspiracyscience.com/forums/topic/lets-talk-about-ancient-astronauts#post-10652</p>

One thing he said once really struck me. He was talking about how the Ancient Egyptians must have had light bulbs. He claimed that he and his friends were investigating the King's chamber in Egypt and in order to test whether or not torches would have worked, he tried to spark his lighter. The lighter didn't work because, according to him, there wasn't enough oxygen. This proves, of course, that torches couldn't have been used, and it must have been some kind of electrical light of sorts. What he failed to explain was, how if there wasn't enough oxygen for his lighter, how he and his friends managed to keep from suffocating.

That show Ancient Aliens on the History Channel knocked them down like 30 places for me.

"Muertos, you are the best writer on this site."

This is true.

But you have really bad taste in music.

I'm not a fan of songs that start off with 5 minutes of fire crackling. :P

It usually gets better after that though.

We will burn these Suburbs to the ground! ... After our WoW raid.

Excellent read, Muertos. This one you clearly hit out of the park.

""Another good post! Does this site get a lot of traffic btw? I know we don't have a lot of posters, but I hope that we have more viewers and lurkers... it'd be a shame for work like this to reach only such a small audience.""

I was a lurker to this site for over a year before I registered. Trust me, they're out there.

^ That's good. I'm glad this is actually getting out there and not just getting preached to the choir so to speak.

I'm also glad to know my words are at least being read by somebody.

And yes, Perry, the fact that we're such a burr in Merola's tailpipe means we are doing something right!

Does the CIA pay you by the blog entry or by the positive review?

@Perry I think personally that Peter revamped Zeitgeist I and II and paid people to make a Zeitgeist companion guide purely because conspiracy science pointed out his conspiracy theory's and how much like the truth movement he uses them to fuel his conspiracy movement. Peter is attempting to pull his movement away from conspiracy theory's because CS blatantly points out the conspiracy's promoted within Zeitgeist I and II that make it just what it is which is a conspiracy movement supported by conspiracy theorist or like the 9/11 truth movement. Peter knows if his movement is associated with conspiracy theory's that the public will not ever take his movement seriously. At that Peter attempts to disassociate his movies with the movement and again the public is suppose to believe that over night Peter decided the movies are in fact not the movement even though TZMers pass out dvd's of both Peter's conspiracy movies like candy.

Right as we Speak, the new movie Peter is making called Zeitgeist moving forward movie is taking priority over anything else in the Zeitgeist movement. The tzm developers have a dead line to get a new TZM website up before the movie comes out and Peter is dictating who can show his Zeitgeist moving forward as he plans to have each chapter within his movement make profit from his movies before he releases it on the internet. Yet somehow the movies are not the movement and Peter is not the leader of the Zeitgeist movement? This is the guy who calls CS members mentally Ill and a bunch of monkeys who throw poop. After what I wrote which person really is mentally Ill here?

Peter indirectly responds to CS by revamping his work. Peter attacks CS because he clearly see's the flaw or the down side of promoting conspiracy theories ultimately knowing it's to late to take those videos back or to make people believe the movies are not the movement because most people are simply not that dumb. Just because Peter says "the movies are not the movement" does not mean it's so, it only shows you covering up your conspiracies with more lies, deceits and half truths. The Zeitgeist movement for is a conspiracy theorist movement for one and for second it's a conspiracy theorist movement that directly promotes and markets conspiracy theorist Peter Joseph Merola's work free of charge and a type of a cult following around the world so everybody can see his work and so to reach his objective which is to get famous. See I don't think Peter cares to much if people label him a conspiracy theorist but when you label Zeitgeist I and II conspiracy theorist movies then people within his movement and people outside raise a eyebrow and my bypass his cult following when they see it promoted on the net or tell their friends it's a conspiracy movement which ultimately means less supporters who have the potential to support and promote his work. This is simple Zeitgeist economics here lol

In short the more people see and associate the conspiracy movies to the movement the less supporters their will be which will ultimately be the less free promotion power they can have at a global level. Little does Peter know that the movies Zeitgeist I and II will follow his movement forever, including and emphasizing the conspiracy parts. The fact that he hides it makes it worse.

He's going to go bonkers that you didn't mention him by name.

http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/3349/f63b20649e854f688308dcc.jpg" />

That guy has serious problems. You really shouldn't indulge him Muertos.

"I do recognize the person who wrote this response, though I won’t identify him here. Suffice it to say he’s one of the most notorious conspiracy theorists out there today, and is certainly in the running for the single most insane conspiracist I’ve ever come across. Nevertheless, he is entitled to his opinions, however strange and unsupportable they are."

I'm thinking Casey is numero uno