Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Lady Gaga's creepy love song to Judas - Page 2

Tags: This thread makes Brenton look like a poser [ Add Tags ]

[ Return to General Conspiracy Stuff | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 05:16
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I actually don't take her as seriously as you'd think, really. But I do think she's a lot more than a lot of people rate her. I think she's heavily underrated. That's probably due to the fact that she's a woman in pop music (although gender doesn't really matter, it's the genre that does more) and a lot of people don't think much of pop music. She's one of those few above-and-beyonds in pop music. I find it odd that you say 'she's just a product' because, really, all good musicians are in one way or another. That doesn't mean they don't have integrity or a sense of realness to them. But the best celebrities art-direct every minute of their public life, that's for sure.

I also don't think you can compare one paradigm to another. To say she's "not Bach" is pretty silly because she could never be Bach, and nor could Bach ever be Gaga. She doesn't exist in that time, genre or any other aspect of Bach's world except that they're both musicians. Doing that is as bad as watching a film and declaring 'it wasn't like the book'. Well, of course it wasn't - they're two totally different mediums of delivery and are based on different ways of appreciation... I don't know if that analogy makes sense, but whatever...

In other words I'm trying to say that comparing one artistic paradigm to another just... doesn't really make a whole lot of sense.

#31 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 10:51
(0)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

Oh yay, the term "pop-culture."

[not]

#32 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 11:06
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Brenton types a lot but doesn't really say much.

#33 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Real RoxettePosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 14:55
(0)
 

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

I was simply saying in 400 years no one will give a shit about Lady Gaga or know anything about her at all, in fact I'd venture to say in 4 years the same will be true. By the way, what's the latest from the revolutionary band Hawthorne Heights? Spice Girls? Run DMC?

#34 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 15:26
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I still want to stick it in her pooper.

#35 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 19:23
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I was simply saying in 400 years no one will give a shit about Lady Gaga or know anything about her at all, in fact I'd venture to say in 4 years the same will be true.

Okay, so, let me ask you if you think the same will be true of Madonna? Cuz Gaga's already outdone her in terms of setting certain records...

If you think the same for Madonna then I can understand where you're coming from, if not, then perhaps I don't...

#36 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Real RoxettePosted: Apr 17, 2011 - 19:46
(0)
 

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

Madonna is already a joke, and besides, you said yourself previously that "she's heavily underrated." If you think that, you can't honestly believe she's starting to beat Madonna. She's everywhere all the time, that's not even remotely close to underrated. I think she is rated, just over, not under. I'd like to know one new thing she's done that hasn't been done before that makes her so special.

#37 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Sil the ShillPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 00:19
(0)
 

Level: 9
CS Original

Yeah, I don't understand how someone is underrated yet apparently setting all these new records.

#38 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Real RoxettePosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 00:21
(0)
 

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

[ i think sil means underrated ]

#39 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Sil the ShillPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 00:29
(0)
 

Level: 9
CS Original

Whoops! Yeah, I meant underrated. Thanks for catching that. :P

#40 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Evil ElvisPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 02:56
(0)
 

STFU!

Level: 1
CS Original

I'd do her. Penis or not, here I come.

#41 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 05:34
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

As man now is, Gaga once was,
As Gaga is, man may become.

I'm sorry. Could. not. help. myself.

I doubt very few of you will get the reference. We'll see, I guess, LOL.

Oh and to summarise Gaga is "different", not the least because she saved pop music as an entire culture from almost certain death. This would have been the last decade of pop music for sure, IMO, if it weren't for her coming. Granted, you could argue someone else could've done it too, but, still, she did.

#42 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Real RoxettePosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 08:22
(0)
 

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

Oh my god, shut up, you only like her because you're a homo and she knows homos give her lots and lots of money/attention. She didn't change or save anything. If she never existed, the only difference is we wouldn't have sad ass imitations like Kesha creating even worse music.

She's an actress trying to portray a character, and she doesn't know when to stop, so you get stupid things said in interviews all the time. They'd be funny if I knew that so many people didn't take them seriously.

#43 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Evil ElvisPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 08:33
(0)
 

STFU!

Level: 1
CS Original

^what she said.

#44 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 09:46
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Gaga isn't "different," she simply knows her target audience (Brenton) and tells them what they want to hear. All of her gay rights stuff was just a cynical attempt to market herself, and you bought into it Brenton.

#45 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KeppPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 09:48
(0)
 

Level: 5
CS Original

Rox is on a pwnage streak.

#46 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 09:51
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Queen of the Gays

For some reason, Gaga’s Monster Cult always seems to think it has me trapped, here. “You love Britney Spears so much,” Little Monsters say to me. “But when’s the last time Britney Spears did anything for the gay community?”

First of all, I completely reject the notion that celebrities are somehow morally required to “speak out” on political and cultural issues. That singers are public figures is a byproduct of the widespread appeal of their craft, not their political aptitude. If Britney Spears just wants to perform, let her perform in peace. We don’t demand that carpenters, teachers, or even lawyers become public advocates for political positions. Why should we expect the same of performers?

Moreover, even if they’re inclined to speak out, I believe that they should always weigh their options prudently: celebrity activism always serves as a double-edged sword. The headlines surrounding Gaga’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell activism were never, for instance, “Lady Gaga speaks out for gay rights,” but rather “LADY GAGA!!!!! speaks out for gay rights.” The celebrity always ends up overtaking the issue, rendering their efforts, intentionally or not, somewhat self-indulgent.

Second, how utterly patronizing is it to ask me such a question in the first place? Do Lady Gaga fans look at me and see nothing but a homosexual? Might it have occurred to the Monster Cult that I have other considerations in mind than my sexual orientation; that my life doesn’t revolve around the fact that I’m gay? When Lady Gaga thanks “the gays” in her speeches, I wonder: would anyone thank “the blacks” for their support? Would any other minority group ever be lumped into such an undifferentiated, stereotypical mass? I have always maintained that Lady Gaga’s affection for gay men is little more than glorified fag-haggery. She simply strikes me as someone whose first reaction to a gay friend’s coming-out would be “Oh my gosh! I love gays! Can we go shopping?” Gay people, to Lady Gaga, are bunch of pink, glittery, fashion-obsessed queens. There’s not a lot of difference between Christian conservatives’ stereotypical views of gays and Lady Gaga’s: the key distinction seems only to be that she likes that stereotype. It’s incredibly condescending — and it’s really a shame, given that she could be using her platform to empower young gay people to be truly individualistic, trailblazing, and self-empowered. Instead, she sends them down the path of the same-old same-old political nonsense, with a liberal dosage of trite cliches about “loving yourself.”

The truth is that being gay doesn’t have to be “about” anything. I think I speak for most gay people when I say that our sexual orientation is not a central part of our identity. Lady Gaga is positively obsessed with our homosexuality — and it’s condescending, not liberating.

http://thetruthaboutgaga.wordpress.com/the-case-against-lady-gaga/

#47 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Sil the ShillPosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 16:15
(0)
 

Level: 9
CS Original

"This would have been the last decade of pop music for sure"

If you define "pop music" as popular music, then how can that ever die?

#48 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Apr 18, 2011 - 16:48
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

Brenton: Shut the fuck up.

Roxette: Shut the fuck up and get naked already.

That's pretty much my assessment lurking this thread.

#49 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 20:28
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Not fair to say that I like her just because I'm gay, very very very untrue (for example, didn't think nearly as high of her during her first album as I do since her releases of Alejandro and Telephone, and her screaming at DADT protests). To take the 'what has she done that others haven't?' question seriously, though, it comes down to her social commentary/activism in the sense that she's the only person (at this time, at least) to use symbolic/occult elements to both comment on society/culture. Every aspect of her artistry is by nature a protest in some way or another.

#50 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:01
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You're full of it Brenton. Musically, Jeffree Starr is a talentless hack. If he wasn't a flaming homo, you wouldn't bother with him. So quit frontin'.

#51 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:24
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

As I've said before, I don't measure the relevance of an artist on "talent". "Talent" means fuck all. The keys to artistry (in my mind) are audacity and having a solid recognizable theme/"brand". Talent is the least important of all things.

I'm not fronting. Jeffree was a model before a musician ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkgGHga8aVE ), and a very talented and interesting model at that. I support artists for social reasons (stupid term, but all I can think of at the moment) ... so for example I support Jeffree because I believe in a gender revolution. I support Gaga (again on social terms) because she's a pure leftie and she's the kind of girl we need to make the right-wing look like an embarrasing thing to be a part of. She's the kind of artist that can do that if she sees the need to.

Granted, I like the music both of them produce (interestingly they're both signed to the same company now) but I certainly don't like them solely for their music. They're both great on stage, too.

Jeffree being more prominent in pop culture, for example, can influence the way society thinks about gender. And when I talk about a 'gender revolution'. That's a big declaration to make that you'll probably just laugh at, but whatever. I'm talking about a time when you'll walk down the street and there'll be people -everywhere- without an obvious identifiable gender. Normal, everyday people. If you want to understand a part of my ideological perfect world, well there's one aspect of it for you.

If you think about creative media and especially digital media, it's focussed around blurring the lines of what the everyday person thinks of as 'reality'. It's not reality but they think it is. The "artists" job this century is to blur that line outside of digital media and start blurring it into reality, into real life situations.

Basically I'm so left that I think the best way to undermine the negative aspects of the right is to totally undermine social conservatism to the point that it's virtually non-existent. Best way to do that is through pop culture. Although, admittedly, artists have been trying to do that for at least 40 years.

#52 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:33
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You're so full of it, man. You focus more on the image being sold to you than the quality of the product itself.

#53 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:36
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

That's because the quality of the image is how people measure the decency of something now. Presentation is everything. You can manipulate lack of talent to look like talent with today's mediums, and even when people know you are they don't care.

Art is an advertising medium at it's worst, and at it's best it's a medium to mobilise/manipulate/direct.

Gone are the days where art is some pointless expression of beauty.

#54 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
SkyPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:37
(0)
 

Level: 3
CS Original

Next Brenton is going to start a thread called "Justin Bieber: Voice of a Generation".

#55 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:38
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I've never listened to Justin Bieber and proud to say I haven't. Stupid ideas get fame, too.

#56 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:38
(0)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

Oh god, art students really are the same everywhere you go.

#57 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:40
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Well, perhaps, except that I reject most of the indie scene (for example I could not name you one local band that I like, except for the one that I've decided to be producer for) - which makes me near-outcast in my attitudes compared to most art students who hate pop culture to death. To me it's a tool and it ought to be used.

Anyway, must be off the to the shops.

#58 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 21:51
(0)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

^ An art student here in Chicago said essentially the same thing. I was as unimpressed with the logic then as I am now.

#59 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Sil the ShillPosted: Apr 19, 2011 - 23:12
(0)
 

Level: 9
CS Original

"Well, perhaps, except that I reject most of the indie scene"

This is what every Indie kid says. Every single one.

#60 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]