Skeptic Project

Cyborg, I did not ban Aegis.

VTV, I did not say that you did.

Since the other thread where I posted this is buried, I'll ask here again.

VTV, can you name one thing you've accomplished with your life? Making kids don't count.

And before you do the "WELL WHAT DO YOU DO" shit, I'll say this: I have a degree in computer science and I'm in the process of getting a second in bioengineering. I've sold two patents. And I've managed to do it all without the "systems approach."

You waited until you thought the heat died down to come back.

VTV did 911.

VTV, it must be nice to make absolutist arguments in an effort to limit the ways in which anyone can characterize you. For example, because I post here I must think the same way as everyone else. Too bad you'll see me disagreeing with people constantly. Too bad my criticism isn't based on your life failures. As much as you'd love for everything here to be monolithic, its not- and your assertion that it is belies your inability to adequately relate to and maneuver an intellectual environment above casual conversation. TVP and TZM have not accomplished a thing, and they will continue along this path because, somehow, what you're doing passes for leadership. You put me on your little "enemy list" despite the fact that I did none of what you claim people on that list did (and, in fact, I was harassed by several idiots from TZM), so don't expect me to ever think youre an honest person. Stop corralling people into single pens- despite what you may believe, I dont disagree with you because I'm a "troll" but because you represent a group that is actually lying to innocent people.

Here's the belief I have: There are posts online with your name and IP address that have Peter Joseph's parents' information in them.There is a cache of this information going back one month before Kush posted his blog post. You changed your story here from the screen shots being photoshopped to you being framed, but you also posted to someoneone else on facebook that you were framed from the get-go. So there is a gap in your stories or explanations. You claim you were framed, but cannot prove that with any hard evidence. The only hard evidence that exists suggests you did it, and you claim that motives would matter in this case, but motives do not overcome hard evidence. So either get your story straight and produce some hard evidence that these posts were forged, or just shut up.

As for your pathetic hypothetical regarding 9/11- it relies on such a series of behavioral assumptions as to being laughable. Perhaps a real world example would be more apt. The Bilderberg meeting minutes have been posted. Now, we can assume that they are genuine because they say nothing incriminating, or they could possibly be forgeries! But, in order to conclude that they are forgeries we would have to have some EVIDENCE that is the case. Until then, we have to assume they are legitimate because there is no reason to doubt the validity of the documents. If we lived in a world governed by your logic, you can never know anything. Hell you have to assume that this post, too, is a forgery.

@ Ed: Yeah, but then again I'm getting a degree and a job. Posting here hasn't detracted from my life.

Me and Falkner thinking alike?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

Oh boy, that's rich.

I love CS because we all disagree so much. I don't need, want nor like echo chambers.

@Anticultist I'll respond to it since VTV seems to think that is some how a major issue. Well I saw on another site people were talking about VTV, think it was on facebook before I lost my FB account; One had suggested he was a pedophile therefore that stuck inside my head. Do I think VTV is a pedo, easy answer I don't know. Was my post somehow to suggest that he was, no not at all, it was to be humorous.

Now VTV brings up yet another claim and yet again neglects to contact me if he has such a problem with that post. The post was not meant to be factual and many people understood this to be humor for example, "OMG Michael Jackson is a pedophile.". Will I retract what I define to be humor and the answer is no I won't. It's meant to be funny just because VTV uses it to push his agenda doesn't make it less funny and heck if he keeps pointing out that I called him a pedo more people will associate the word pedo with VTV's name and that doesn't look good.

I can't seem to find the facebook post where I had seen posts about VTV being accused of being pedophile but it's there somewhere. I don't care to look for it. I think VTV needs to take these accusation to the people who are accusing him of being a pedophile. I wish I could help VTV out at least with pointing him to a link but alas I cannot.

To repeat do I use it into a context that VTV is a pedo to be factual no, my intention was for humor like Michael Jackson humor (we don't really know if he did it). The people who accused VTV of being a pedo on a facebook group did however.

^ I saw it somewhere on a facebook group topic. I think it may have been the facebook groups that got deleted by VTV however not sure.

^ I agree

I'm not a unreasonable person, If VTV has a problem with that post all he has to do is post in this thread that he wants it deleted, or he can PM me on CS and I'll attempt to work on getting that post down. So far I've not received any contact from VTV about this until today. If he has such a problem with it I'm willing to work with him on it. For some reason I don't think he really wants to actually work on what he deems as a problem though.

Its not VTV's fault he's a crappy parent, its the monetary system's.

lol

Did you ever find that snippet about Brittany in the mp3 bill ?

VTV is a nonce:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nonce

Not
On
Normal
Communal
Excercise

Prisoner W23899 Kiernan Stephenson is a nonce.

Ah ok well if I can find it for you I will let you check it out