Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Zeitard spreads fear mongering conspiracy craziness

[ Add Tags ]

[ Return to The Zeitgeist Movement | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: May 19, 2011 - 21:40
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

A friend sent me a link to an article which reads:

"The United States Congress is set to vote on legislation that authorizes the official start of World War 3.

The legislation authorizes the President of the United States to take unilateral military action against all nations, organizations, and persons, both domestically and abroad, who are alleged to be currently or who have in the past supported or engaged in hostilities or who have provided aid in support of hostilities against the United States or any of its coalition allies.

The legislation removes the requirement of congressional approval for the use of military force and instead gives the President totalitarian dictatorial authority to engage in any and all military actions for an indefinite period of time.

It even gives the President the authority to launch attacks against American Citizens inside the United States with no congressional oversight whatsoever.

Just to recap, because that was a mouthful:

* Endless War – The war will continue until all hostilities are terminated, which will never happen.
* No Borders – The president will have the full authority to launch military strikes against any country, organization or person, including against U.S citizens on U.S soil.
* Unilateral Military Action – Full authority to invade any nation at any time with no congressional approval required.
* No Clearly Defined Enemy – The US can declare or allege anyone a terrorist or allege they are or have been supporting “hostilities” against the US and attack at will.
* Authorization To Invade Several Countries – The president would have full authority to invade Iran, Syria, North Korea, along with several other nations in Africa and the Middle East and even Russia and China under the legislation all of which are “know” to have supported and aided hostilities against the United States."

Link to the article: blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/05/15/con...clear-enemies-22785/

It seems to me that the government is finally going for the win with this one. If this bill is real and it gets passed, we can say goodbye to whatever little freedom of speech we had left. Saying or doing anything that can be considered "terrorism" is reason enough to be executed by the military. Its completely batshit insane!

What are your thoughts on this? Is there anything we can do as a movement to prevent this from happening? I think its critical that we all keep a close eye on this.

http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=231&id=340403&Itemid=100114&lang=en#340403

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Kaiser FalknerPosted: May 19, 2011 - 21:42
(0)
 

HAIL HYDRA

Level: 6
CS Original

They had a legal expert from the ACLU on NPR yesterday talking about this. Its actually part of the current defense measure in congress, and it amounts to a slight expansion of the War Powers Act but does not remove congress' power to declare war- what it does do is make the 60 day limit much more flexible. It should not be allowed to pass, but this guy really let his imagination run wild.

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Wolf BirdPosted: May 19, 2011 - 21:49
(0)
 

I shoot you dead.

Level: 9
CS Original

But NPR and the ACLU are NWO shills covering the truth.

In truth, though...big whoop. Moron zeitard.

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Burger KingPosted: May 19, 2011 - 22:02
(0)
 

I can't stop posting pictures of poop, what the fuck is wrong with me?

Level: 5
CS Original

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAA

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
The Real RoxettePosted: May 20, 2011 - 04:07
(0)
 

There ARE more sluts in public schools. Shut up and let me explain.

Level: 8
CS Original

It's 2003 all over again. What's most hilarious about things like this, when it comes to the US congress especially, you almost never see direct, sourced quotations proving the claims made by CTs regarding legislation, it just "is".

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]