Skeptic Project

http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/articles/nwo/denver-international-airport/</p>

A lot of stuff has been made up about DIA, most are lies, and as far the mural, who cares if it's been painted over, it was up for years and isn't hidden knowledge. It isn't hard to find out what the artist was going for, he tells you, it's all in the linked article above.

Not only did locals not want this airport built nor was it needed, but everything was done to make sure it was built despite that.

Lie, the opposite is true. The old airport was way too small and encroaching on residents.

You can't possibly suggest that every single claim ever made about anything be addressed, if the core claims are lies and bullshit, what makes you think any of the other ones are true? If any of the ones are true, does that therefore mean the original lies will magically become true too?

If you do have concerns about things not mentioned in our article, ask them here, I or someone else can probably help you figure it out.

Also, there's this quote:

"One of the interesting things I ran across looking at all this stuff before I updated it was that it seemed the murals, even the ones that were just painted over, had at some point been at first retouched and made more vibrant, clear and detailed.

They haven’t been up that long to fade or get so filthy they had to be restored. I first saw this "Updating" on The Burning City but thought maybe it was just the various resolutions and contrasts; I have a few actual hard copies of photos that were different coloring than those I found online, and online stuff is copied so many times it loses things.

But I found another example in another scene of the colors being totally different and renewed so figured I probably wasn’t wrong after all. It’s strange that someone would put all the time, work and energy into only touching up the more disturbing images, making them clearer and bolder - then erase it all in the end."

I have a solution for all of your concerns:

Stop reading stupid conspiracy sites.

Its like you're addicted to paranoid fear mongering. You really need professional help.

It's all true. It really is a Masonic/Illuminati conspiracy to paint scary pictures so people rushing to the other side of the airport to make their connecting flight may or may not see them, especially when they stop to pick up a Cinnabon and a Michael Crichton novel to read on the plane. And these paintings clearly have some sort of magical powers. I mean, you can't have an airport with flying machines taking people around the world without magic.

omfg, why dont you turn your art critic eye to something worthy of your attention like some monet, renoir and van gogh. Perhaps you can find something conspiratorial in those ?

Man the waste of peoples time given to rationalising what an artist was trying to capture in a painting, instead of actually going to the source and finding out is fucking retarded.

At least this guy is still alive and can be asked about it, try explaining what a fucking dahli is about.

Van Gogh cut his ear off because the reptilian overlords demanded a sacrifice; they didn't like Starry Night Over the Rhone.

I agree. I have a Mucha in the dining room that would scare the hell out of this one.