Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - Article: The Zeitgeist Movement - Page 28

Tags: zeitgeist, The Zeitgeist Movement, TZM, Peter Merola bans for criticism, 2012 is way better than 2010, three thinks a pixelated image hit the pentagon, 911 was an outside job, Three couldn't take the heat, so he ran away, New Age horse shit, three doesnt need evidence it exists in his head, laundry list of canned ZM responses, TABULA RASA IS GARBAGE SRSLY, What the fuck is Nanos talking about?, NANOS TAKE YOUR MEDICATION, OMFG THIS THREAD IS OFF TOPIC, CLOSED, Nanos [ Add Tags ]

This forum thread is currently locked, no new replies or edits can be made.

[ Return to The Zeitgeist Movement | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:16
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Though I have pondered recently that running off batches of clones might be a good idea, as there just isn't enough folk like me to go around.. "

I would firebomb the cloning facility.

#811 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:25
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> I do like the idea of having to complete a "parenting education" prior to
> having children.

I like that too.

Unless you limit the number of kids born, you will run into overpopulation issues..

At the very least, letting any couple have one, your giving people the option.

Its like a fat limit, you can eat burgers, but if you eat too many, its bad for you...

Just steralise folk after they have had one kid. (Though you could let folk apply for more in advance, perhaps people who don't want, or can't have kids, can put their 1 in a pool and people who want more can dip into that pool so folk who want 10 kids, might be able to have them.. but only because 10 other folk are going without.)

Population control is a hot potato that needs firm control, or its just going to run all into the ground as nature isn't kind with overpopulation issues..

#812 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:26
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"Just steralise folk after they have had one kid."

I really wish you would just go away you creepy weirdo.

#813 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:27
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> I would firebomb the cloning facility.

Thats why I'm a great believer in security :-)

And fire proof buildings, and sprinkler systems..

And more than one building..

I reckon if there a hundred like me in every country, it would only take a hundred years to convert the entire world into a nice place to live..

#814 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
PeacenikPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:27
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

matt, do you notice that other people here are happy to swap ideas and thoughts? capitalism works? yes, for the rich and the middle classes maybe. many debunkers have conceded that capitalism isn't working so i'll interact with them if i'm boring you.

had trotsky not been betrayed by stalin and co. after lenin's death we may have seen a world-wide movement. trotsky opposed stalin's peace with hitler which had a negative effect on the workers movement across europe. i won't list all the other progressive movements hijacked by dictators, but they are plentiful.

my idea? a united anti-capitalist movement, whose first aim is to educate the masses on the ills of the capitalist beast. i'm starting with you matt.

#815 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:28
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> I really wish you would just go away you creepy weirdo.

Says the guy responding in a top notch scientific way with an even weirder name..

#816 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:31
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I think to succeed, you need a pro-capitalist movement, but one that evolves and improves capitalism, as I reckon it can help the poor, if only we was more ethical about profits and didn't screw them over so much.

Profit sharing for example, a cooperative, these are capitalist things in todays world, yet the workers don't get shafted.

Here is an excellent UK example of a profit sharing private company:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lewis_Partnership</p>

One could have many such companies like that, still capitalist, but creating a better world, without needing to break or be anti-capitalist.

#817 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 10:31
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"my idea? a united anti-capitalist movement, whose first aim is to educate the masses on the ills of the capitalist beast. i'm starting with you matt."

Boy, that idea sucks.

#818 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:44
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

I do like the idea of having to complete a "parenting education" prior to
having children.

And who is the expert who decides you are capable?

this is fucking stupid, there are people who are handicapped who would love children and should have them as well, but they are limited in their abilities due to faults not of their own making. Will we decide they cant have kids?
What about people who have low incomes who will never be in a position to better their financial status? Do we stop them from having children too?

Fucking stupidity in this thread is astounding.

Education ? My word some of you people needed that education yourselves it seems, with ideas like this you are incapable of understanding anything about having children it seems.
making statements that people are stupid and dont know how to bring up their own children is a baseless thing. lets see how well you fuckers do bringing up kids

Just steralise folk after they have had one kid

Again Bullshit and wreckless. The Earth can and does sustain us easily, there is enough room, resources to sustain us. Its a known fact to anyone whos even bothered to dos some research that maintaining a family with 2 children will stabilise the population. The population is increasing, but it will eventually stabilise, it is not permanently increasing. The age differences in people alive today is vast, and not every human is in the child bearing bracket.

People who are making out like the population is at a dangerous level and that Earth can not sustain us are retarded.

This thread is just filled with people making assumptions and spouting stupid fucking solutions for problems that do not exist.

Noone has the right to dictate who has children, how many they have, when they have them, and anyone interfering with this or with an intention to... needs to fuck off.

#819 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:46
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

And who is the expert who decides you are capable?

this is fucking stupid, there are people who are handicapped who would love children and should have them as well, but they are limited in their abilities due to faults not of their own making. Will we decide they cant have kids?
What about people who have low incomes who will never be in a position to better their financial status? Do we stop the from having children too?

This thread is just filled with people making assumptions

Indeed. I didn't say anyone would be denied the right to have children. I said I think it's a good idea to have a mandatory class that exposes them to important information. I'd still be ok with a test of their knowledge (ie: is it unhealthy to drink while pregnant?) before they can have children.

#820 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:49
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

No I am not making assumptions if your quote mine is infering that.

I am making statements against the retarded shit in this thread.

#821 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:50
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

Was what I said "retarded"? If so, how?

Nice use of terms there after defending the disabled.

Oh, and quote mining me.

#822 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:51
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

This has to be the most off topic thread in all of Conspiracy Science.

#823 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:52
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I will fight you all.

#824 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:54
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Im not a politically correct person, its not something I consider important, If I call someone a retard it means just that, they are retarded.

The difference between this is the person acting retarded has a choice not to act or talk that way.

A truly handicapped person has little option and therefore is not even in the same brackets of stupidity, because its not their fault.

Ive explained above why I said its retarded.

None of you are equipped or expert to tell anyone else how to live, how to bring up a child or what to do in any circumstances life throws you or a childs way.

How can any of you know what should be done in all situations to bring a child up in this world?

There is no such thing as an expert in this matter, parenting and life is way more complicated than a silly fucking class can teach you.

#825 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:55
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

True Edward, its so dumb its beyond dumb.

@Matt I will win. :D

#826 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:56
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

anticultist, do you think it's fair for a mother to smoke and drink while pregnant?

I'm not calling for preventing anything. I think the baby deserves to have informed parents.

#827 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 11:59
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Aaron thats common sense healthcare issues and nothing to do with parenting, thats pre natal medical matters, and this knowledge has been around for decades, those women who ignore that are just addicts who dont prioritise their baby above their own needs.

If your example is to say they should not have children and this is why they should have classes, no they should listen to their midwife and the healthcare adverts/pamphlets who already told her about this matter.

#828 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:03
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

those women who ignore that are just addicts who dont prioritise their baby above their own needs

Possibly. But if there was a mandatory class that teaches and tests this information with pictures and videos of children with alcohol-fetal-syndrome, isn't it possible that mothers will think longer and harder about their decisions?

There are also those parents who don't actually know this "common sense" stuff.

Research has shown that the best parenting style is an authoritative one. What is wrong with informing people of these results? It's not telling anybody they have to parent a certain way. Rather, it is showing them what's healthiest. If they still think spanking or spoiling the child after completing the class is best, then they can still do it.

#829 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:03
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> who is the expert who decides you are capable?

A good question that..

We used to have to rely on natural selection, but if we are not, then some experts will have to decide just who gets to have more than one kid, seems fair to me, its not like your saying no one can have any kids..

> The Earth can and does sustain us easily, there is enough room, resources to sustain us.

Really ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_footprint</p>

> For 2006, humanity's total ecological footprint was estimated at 1.4 planet Earths – in other words, humanity
> uses ecological services 1.4 times as fast as Earth can renew them.

> The population is increasing, but it will eventually stabilise, it is not permanently increasing.

Stabilise yes, but at what cost..

> People who are making out like the population is at a dangerous level and that Earth can not sustain us are retarded.

One could equally say the same for the oppersite camp.

I'm quite prepaired to listen to your evidence to convince me otherwise.

There is also a good reason to maintain your population level below the maximumn the planet can handle, so as to increase the standard of living for all, as I think we'd all agree, its better to share a cake so that everyone gets a big slice, than a tiny sliver..

You also have local population density issues which need addressing too, eg. you can't have too many people trying to use too many local services at once, or you get congestion.

#830 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:04
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

> For 2006, humanity's total ecological footprint was estimated at 1.4 planet Earths – in other words, humanity
> uses ecological services 1.4 times as fast as Earth can renew them.

Remember you talking about a non sustainable society, change the way we operate and there is no problem at all.

#831 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:06
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

@Aaron I am almost certain this is a pre requisite set of information given to every woman who is having a child in the western world.

Have you ever been with a woman when she is pregnant to a health care centre to chat with a midwife ?

#832 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:08
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

And what about the parenting styles?

Do all women have a midwife? To answer your question, no I have not been there.

#833 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:12
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Parenting styles?

What the hell are you on about, its not University class for teachers.

Do you know every solution to every problem there is concerning children?
Do you know anyone on the planet who knows how to remedy every single parenting problem known to man?

There is no such thing as a style, children are constantly evolving human beings not robots, they flip and flop every second of the day, changing moods and wants. They do things that are truly stupid and dont listen to their parents, a class on how to train and control your child will lead to nothing but problems.

Children dont listen the sooner you people understand that the better.

#834 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:13
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> change the way we operate and there is no problem at all.

I agree that we could change it, but whilst more sustainablity is a good thing, more population isn't necessarly a good thing.

Sustainability doesn't mean everything is 100% recyclable, if there are more of us, we will use up irreplaceable resources faster, and for what purpose, so that another 100 billion people can come into existance ?

But the issue is perhaps not the future, the issue is the here and now, that we are at the moment using more resources than we have available and we need to now control the population level.

Once we have the resources that we can handle more people, then we could let more be born, but at the expense of a lower standing of living than we would otherwise have.

As a rough guide, taking the UK standard of living, if we had to share the world so that everyone got the same standard of living, it would mean roughly UK folk would see their standard cut to 1/4 of what it is now.

Now, if we had 75% less people, we could have 4 times the standard of living, and thus no drop for UK'ers. (US'ers I hear use far more and we would need an even bigger drop in the population level to get that for everyone.)

One way to reduce the population without killing people off is to make sure less are born. (Which seems to happen naturally in more advanced nations on the whole, though there does seem to be some exceptions from that last time this subject came up..)

Which is why I'm keen to increase the standard of living for folk, to reduce their want of producing more children, but I reckon we'll still need more control than that to keep local population levels within acceptable limits and make sure everyone gets a seat on the bus!

#835 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:14
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

We dont need to control the population level at all.

You ever heard of a thing called nature ?

Well I suggest you research what happens when the population gets too little or large in the animal kingdom.

We are animals too in case you didnt realise.

#836 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:17
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

@Nanos,

You are one of the most disgustingly arrogant people I have ever seen.

And I mean that. You make me want to puke.

#837 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
NanosPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:19
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

> None of you are equipped or expert to tell anyone else how to live

I am!

To a limited degree mind you, I don't know everything, but experience has taught me a little about what works and what doesn't.

> How can any of you know what should be done in all situations to bring a child up
> in this world?

Not all, but enough to make a difference.

For example, being poor finanically when bringing up a kid, isn't good for the kid, thus only parents with a decent amount of resources should have kids.

Breeding poor kids does no one any favours..

> There is no such thing as an expert in this matter, parenting and life is way
> more complicated than a silly fucking class can teach you.

In the old days, these experts used to be family members, older members who had kids themselves, learnt from experience what works and what doesn't.

Nowdays, experts can have access to far more knowledge about what is and what isn't good for kids.

(Thats not to say that a lot of so called experts these days are inexperienced childless out of university idiots who think an education that teaches them tons of wrong things is going to help..)

Its not no experts we need, its experts with the right knowledge!

#838 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
sorryPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:20
(0)
 

Level: 12
CS Original

Parenting styles?

What the hell are you on about, its not University class for teachers.

Do you know every solution to every problem there is concerning children?
Do you know anyone on the planet who knows how to remedy every single parenting problem known to man?

There is no such thing as a style, children are constantly evolving human beings not robots, they flip and flop every second of the day, changing moods and wants. They do things that are truly stupid and dont listen to their parents, a class on how to train and control your child will lead to nothing but problems.

Children dont listen the sooner you people understand that the better.

Perhaps the majority of children who don't listen are from authoritarian and indulgent parents.

As, you know, the research actually suggests.

#839 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
anticultistPosted: Jul 16, 2010 - 12:21
(0)
 

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Nanos do you have any children ?

Or are you one of those I know how to bring up children perfectly but dont want any types. ?

I know a lot of people who claim theyre experts at matters they have fuck all exeperience in. Jacque Fresco and Peter Merola are two prime examples.

#840 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]