Skeptic Project

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:07

(0)

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

Well I think he was saying be true to yourself and fight if you must, dont be a pussy using non violence as a mask when you really have no balls and will to fight. So in essence he was not saying violence was bad only to get it out of your system if its for the right reasons.

Ghandi was a complex cat.

#152

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:08

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I get so tired of this meme about "terrorists with box cutters." You're playing with language to make it seem absurd that people could take over an airplane with box cutters.

Newsflash: Box cutters are pretty fucking scary if wielded by a lunatic.

#153

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:08

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

"You would shit your pants if someone came at you with a box cutter."

lol. you sure seem to know everything i would/do do.... are you some kind of conspiracy theorist?

#154

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:09

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

what about a plane full of people? would everyone just start shitting everywhere?

#155

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:09

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"lol. you sure seem to know everything i would/do do.... are you some kind of conspiracy theorist?"

Nah, I abandoned the idea that TZM will ever make it far enough to become a threat.

#156

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:09

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

If only Matt was here for casey.

I would like to hear someone's opinion of that 1:10 mark in the video three linked.

#157

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:11

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

It's funny because my ream name is Matt too... but im not a douche.

#158

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:11

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Boxcutters are nothin' man, three would fend them off with a PDF of Zeitgeist rhetoric.

Edit: Yes, you are.

#159

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:12

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

I feel wrong for laughing at the idea of everyone shitting on those planes.

#160

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:14

(0)

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

three would fend them off with a PDF of Zeitgeist rhetoric

haha

#161

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:14

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

Im 6' 2" 195lbs and I am a semi-professional athlete. If someone came at me with a box cutter, I would probably get cut. But I probably wouldn't let them hijack the plane I was on.

lol @ Shits on a Plane

#162

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:16

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

"three would fend them off with a PDF of Zeitgeist rhetoric"

HILARIOUS thing is that a stack of paper would ACTUALLY WORK TO DEFEND YOURSELF AGAINST A BOX CUTTER. HAHAHAHAHAH!

#163

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:16

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Must be nice to sit here and be an armchair hostage.

Because being on a hijacked plane is totally just like talking about it on the Internet.

#164

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:17

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

Don't tell me you're a wrestler, too.

And he's using caps...

#165

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:17

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

you're right, my adrenaline would actually make me much more powerful and more easily disarm the terrorist with a box cutter.

#166

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:18

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

You're a retard.

#167

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:19

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

no, i play http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAyEti-_lR8

#168

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:20

(0)

Level: 12
CS Original

I'm still interested in the video three posted.

#169

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:21

(0)

Level: 10
CS Original

@Ed Why was Dick cheney in charge of NORAD

He wasn't.

and why were no planes scrambled?

There were.

What do you see at 1:10 in this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EIg9zz091A

A fake video? LOL?

Its not the first time and this looks shockingly bad at that.

Not even the most rabid no Pentagon planers (ie. The One Flew Over the Pentagon) variety think a missile hit the Pentagon anymore. They think that's disinfo, what really happened is the plane flew over the Pentagon while no one noticed. Of course...

You think if this were a real video truthers would be claiming for all these years that there was no video?

I suspect your case of the twoof is worse than I imagined.

#170

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:21

(0)

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

video @ 1.10 blurred and looks like it could be an aircraft fuselage. you cant see the wings but then the angle may not help, the image blurring certainly does not help, the lighting may not help.

Anyone here done any aircraft recognition techniques and study?

I have we were taught it in the armed forces and its not easy because you are taught to differentiate between shapes and shadows. It requires good conditions to be able to do it concisely, someone should ask a true aircraft recognition expert to debunk that.

But the video itself is not conclusive evidence of it being a missile far from it, it just looks like a bad video footage of a blurred aircraft/object.

#171

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:22

(0)

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Video @ 1:10 looks like a bunch of pixelated crap that tells me nothing.

#172

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:22

(0)

Level: 1
CS Original

cya guys, have a nice life! hope i never talk to you guys again!

#173

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:22

(0)

Level: 10
CS Original

Even other truthers in the comments think its fake:

"While I am convinced that a missile hit the Pentagon that awful day, this looks terribly fake"

...

"Although the chances that it was not a plane that hit, are very high
-But this is not a video of a missile hitting, it is a fake,
I hope nobody shows it to their friends to "prove" a missile hit, as they will look silly when it is revealed that it is a fake.
-it's a set up, don't fall into it"

That's how you know you're really, REALLY wrong.

#174

Posted: Jun 15, 2010 - 17:23

(0)

Brainwashing you for money

Level: 15
CS Original

oh three did we not agree with you enough to make you happy ?

#175