Skeptic Project

Posted in another thread I felt it should have its own.

http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=99999&func=view&catid=7&id=266724#266732

Wait until I re-release it in a number of weeks with a near 300 page Source Guide that is being put together by a team of researchers I have hired. (I am busy working on the third film so my time is limited.)

I can't wait for that!

And it will be even more hilarious when his paid "team of researchers" turns up stupid conspiracy site and after stupid conspiracy site.

, Z1 is less of a traditional docu than a challenge in critical thought.

That's actually true, but in the complete opposite way to what Peter is talking about.

There are also deliberate exaggerations as the work is artistic

Wow..

actually like that it has some errors right now, for it forces/encourages people to research.

Why has it taken him this long to admit there are errors in the film?

Lets just see what new "errors" and "deliberate exaggerations" we can find in this new version. I wonder if he has learnt anything in the past 3 years.

Therefore the attacks come easy to those who do not have the ability/interest to research on their own.

I debated 911 on that bloody forum for over a year and and he is calling me lazy.

-----------

Someone says that the cut steel picture (http://www.911truth.dk/first/img/wtcCutColumnLarge.jpg) was cut by firemen in the cleanup not by thermite.

Peter then hand waves it saying... "I love it. people just cant help themselves."

Someone else replies saying that they also agree that it wasn't cut by thermite and then Peter replies:

I have found the slab/torch, post collapse arguments to be inconclusive. We simply don't know when the cut occurred and how.

Yes, we do Peter.

It was a thermal lance. It looks exactly like a thermal lance cut, it has all the hallmarks of a thermal lance cut and we have other pictures of ground zero workers cutting columns at angles with thermal lances where you can see the same molten slag dripping off it.

This is the kind of nonsense that is going to be in the new film I know it, truthers are always invariably wrong about everything back to front.

However, I think the speculation is firmly justified given the other patterns that coincide.

What other patterns?

Thermite can't cut sideways and there would be no reason to cut columns at the base of a building collapsing from above.

I'm not going to debate this here so don't try.

This is just the start if he releases his new film...

There are many things that cannot be confirmed on both sides of the spectrum and I certainly don't expect everyone to agree.

More vague nonsense in order to pretend to be a skeptic.

In the consideration of any complex case such as this, it isn't about any single piece of evidence, it is about the how all the evidence fits together and the underlying logic that emerges probabilistically.

All the evidence is lies, falsehoods and quote-mines. So the conclusion is that truthers are a bunch of lying, incompetent, fools and so is Peter Joseph.

In the next post he says:

The most dramatic changes in the new version of the work are in Part 3.

Which means that Part 2 will basically be the same shit we saw before.

Can't wait!

I don't get why they even bother with Z1.

PJs orientation guide on artificial scarcity and cyclical consumption was pretty good, he should focus on that.

PJs orientation guide on artificial scarcity and cyclical consumption was pretty good, he should focus on that.

Its too boring, I guess.

That's why the Venus Project says people should set up showings of ZG1+2.