Skeptic Project

Someone gave me a link to this, I find it funny TVP actually still tries to claim such things.



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mnTxRJ4qtFy8Kdj1kIRhz45ZSHhm2JTNm1t8-9cApDU/edit?pli=1

Title: A matter related to Peter Joseph


From Andrew Buxton via Skype


Hi all, just wanted to get something out there amongst those of us who support this direction and want to see it implemented one day.

As you may or may not be aware, Peter Joseph has over the last few years referred to Jacque and his lifes work less and less especially publicly and on his tv interviews to the point now where he lies about where this information came from. This is dishonest and harmful to this direction.

Andrew Buxton: If you see any such video/radio interviews please find the email contact for the host/interviewer and let everyone know in the skype group.

What is then needed is for anyone who feels that this is wrong in this group, to to send letters to the interviewers when they ask PJ how he came up with these ideas or where he got these ideas from and he does not mention the source as being TVP and Jacque Fresco.

When one interviewer asked him this Peter replied, It just dawned on me. This can not just "dawn" on anyone it took many years or experimentation and research by Fresco to put this together. This is a Fraudulent statement and the Interviewer should be aware of this.

The people interviewing should know of the work of TVP, introduce them to the person who did the work to arrive at this direction and that these conclusions did not come from PJ.

He did not do any of the work to arrive at this direction and come up with the conclusions he advocates. He should be called out on this from the people interviewing and embarrassed out of doing that.

The interviewers should also have the opportunity to interview the originator of this direction. It is important to get this information to those interviewing when Peter insinuates that it is something he originated and this is a lie, and the viewers should be aware of that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPWpJwfV9jE 1:49:00 onwards
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XOyEil_o38 01:00 onwards
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpD4YO5UHHo


Peter in the early days before he decided to plagiarise Jacques lifes work http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU0FSxtFoiU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EewGMBOB4Gg Movie "By Peter" all about where he got RBE from (i.e jacque and his lifes work)

For guys claiming that nobody really invents anything, they're really good at being butthurt over attribution of authorship.

I only see one obvious rip that TZM did which is take TVP's Resource Based Economy and reword it to Resource Based Economic Model that supports charities. Other than that TVP rips a lot of it's material which is based on Sociology off other people. In respect to TVP's RBE or TZM's RBEM it's entirely based on pseudoscience.

I think TVP at that Buxton is going a bit insane that Peter gets more interviews with crank sources than his group. Hence cranks attacking cranks to get attention.