Skeptic Project

Your #1 COINTELPRO cognitive infiltration source.

Page By Category

Forum - So who's gonna sit through Moving Fartword?

Tags: The Zeitgeist Movement, Jared Lee Loughner, anti-vaxxer, collapse [ Add Tags ]

[ Return to The Zeitgeist Movement | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:01
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I'm not.

#1 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:03
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

I'm not either. I will probably watch it when it's uploaded online, though. But I'd rather go out for dinner with a friend than buy a ticket for a screening.

#2 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:05
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

"I will probably watch it when it's uploaded online, though."

Wouldn't that be sitting through it?

#3 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:06
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Well, yes. But my interpretation of what you were asking was more to the effect of asking whether any of us were going to a screening and then sitting through a 9347337297 hour ramble between the participants at the screening. That, I will not be doing. But I'll certainly be watching it because I want to be able to comment on it.

#4 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:12
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Some things are worthy of condemnation before consideration.

#5 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Wolf BirdPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:15
(0)
 

I shoot you dead.

Level: 9
CS Original

No. While Zeitgeisters sit and watch their woo, I'll be painting the inside of a Habitat house, and thus accomplish more for humanity in one day than the entirety of the Zeitgeist movement.

#6 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:18
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

HAHA Wolf Bird, I like.

#7 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
JoePosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:19
(0)
 

Level: 8
CS Original

I have not seen the first two; why start now.

#8 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
AKBastardPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:31
(0)
 

Level: 5
CS Original

One of us has to watch it, how else can we bash it?

#9 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 21:44
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

^ Agree.

Although a more appropriate term would be critical analysis, than bash. Bash is more appropriate after the analysis is done.

#10 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
duncanlecombrePosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:03
(0)
 

Level: 2
CS Original

Maybe its full of thought provoking idea's.................
probably not, my bet is its full of un-debunk-able fluff, by un-debunk-able I don not mean its full of Rock Solid evidence, but rather abstract ideas and opinions which cannot be fully refuted as they are not actual facts that peter could get wrong. Then Peter can claim we did not debunk his movie, therefore everything he ever says is correct.

#11 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
KeppPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:06
(0)
 

Level: 5
CS Original

I don't think he can pull off a movie with nothing but negative claims, but we will see.

Or rather his ego won't let him.

#12 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Edward L WinstonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:13
(0)
 

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho: porn star and five-time ultimate smackdown wrestling champion!

Level: 150
CS Original

I'll sit through it when it is released online, but I'm definitely not going to sit with a bunch of 16 year olds at a Pizza place -- that's what it is here -- and watch a 3 hour movie that I'll likely hate. I don't like hypothesizing about the "debunkability" of the movie though, because the second one surprised the hell out of me at its content, the same could definitely happen again.

#13 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:15
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

@ducanlecombre:

I think if it DOES have lots of negative 'undebunkable' stuff, is that the undebunkable fluff will come up when Peter's just narrating a section with stock-footage and photographs and that the actual interesting and relevant stuff will come from the Harvard dude and any other possible academics that he's managed to score an interview with. The question will be whether he'll just take their information as it is, or bend & interpret it to fit the ZM world-view - and considering the situation there's a good chance he'll try and do that, I think.

Seriously, though, in the trailer - why didn't he airbrush tanktop's skin? I mean, isn't one of the core unspoken philosophies of the movement that humanity is perfect and thus able to create an ideal world? Don't you have to be ideal to create something ideal?

Also Peter needs some hair removal cream.

#14 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:25
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Its got Mike Ruppert in it.

It will not be "undebunkable."

People have been debunking Mike Ruppert for years.

#15 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:36
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Yeah, I know. I'm referring more to the academics which may or may not be credible anyway, but, we'll have to wait and see - maybe the Harvard Professor is the only academic...

#16 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:37
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Professor of what?

#17 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:38
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

AND Melbourne's screening begins at 10.30AM anyway. OMG. I don't even have to be out of bed at that time for uni.

#18 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:39
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

He mentioned him in his response e-mail.

"...I feature a prominent Harvard Criminal Psychologist by the name of Dr. James Gilligan who headed the Centre for the Study of Violence at Harvard Medical School for many years..."

#19 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:44
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

Uh.... he's a FORMER professor at Harvard Medical School.

Disingenuous as hell.

#20 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
BrentonPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:47
(0)
 

Level: 0
CS Original

Oh, personally I wouldn't say that just because he's former he can't be trusted - unless he was fired for reasons that paint him as disingenuous or something like that.

#21 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 14, 2011 - 22:53
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

The point is that in typical Merola fashion he warps reality to fit his narrative.

#22 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 07:45
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original
#23 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 07:59
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

^ Looks like they (she?) publish(es) a whole lot of woo.

#24 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 08:06
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original

This was the linked source for the page on Dr. what's his face.

#25 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 08:10
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

http://www.jkp.com/search/index.php?s=vaccine

Look what I found. Its a publisher of anti-vaxxer woo.

Typical Merola.

#26 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Omni-SciencePosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 08:17
(0)
 

Ordo Ab Chao.

Level: 8
CS Original
#27 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 08:20
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

The credibility of Merola's sources is already going down the toilet and the movie isn't even out yet.

Again: Typical Merola.

#28 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Senor DingdongPosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 18:50
(0)
 

Level: 1
CS Original

I'd rather eat a big bowl of shit than to hear another minute of a minted upper class dolt lecturing me on my abberant behaviour.

#29 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]
Agent MattPosted: Jan 15, 2011 - 19:10
(0)
 

Genuine American Monster

Level: 70
CS Original

I forgot who it was that dug up Merola's parents' Facebook profiles.

Let's just say: they ain't hurting for money. Nowhere remotely close.

I wonder if that's a clue towards Merola's hatred for families and money.

#30 [ Top | Reply to Topic ]